Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

Skip to Content

Changes to Florida's Mediation Rule Will Affect Insurers

On November 3, 2011, the Florida Supreme Court amended Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.720 pertaining to mediation procedures. The amendment, which becomes effective January 1, 2012, significantly impacts insurers' mediation obligations. Changes to the rule are summarized below:

  1. Unless permitted by Court Order or stipulation, a party and the party's counsel must be physically present with a representative of the insurer for any insured party; 
  2. The insurer's representative may not be the insurer's outside counsel;
  3. The insurer's representative who appears must have full authority to settle, without further consultation, in an amount up to the amount of the plaintiff's last demand or the policy limits, whichever is less;
  4. Ten days before the mediation conference, each party must file and serve a written notice identifying the persons who will attend the mediation, including the insurance representative, and confirming that the parties who will be attending the mediation have the authority required by the rule; 
  5. If a party and the required representatives fail to appear at the mediation conference, the court shall impose sanctions, including mediation fees, attorneys’ fees, and costs; and 
  6. Failure to file the confirmation of authority or failure of the identified representatives to appear at the mediation shall create a rebuttable presumption that the party has failed to appear.

This rule change will require significant pre-mediation preparation by insurers. An insurer must identify the appropriate representative at least 10 days before the mediation conference. That representative must have full policy limit authority or full authority up to the amount of the last demand, whichever is less. Committee notes to the rule amendment state: "First, the party representative must be the final decision maker with respect to all issues presented by the case in question. Second, the party representative must have the legal capacity to execute a binding agreement on behalf of the settling party."

The Rule does not specifically address issues relating to multiple layers of insurance.

Insurers are encouraged to discuss the new mediation rule with counsel and implement processes to ensure that the rule's requirements will be satisfied. Moreover, before participating in mediation, insurers must confer with counsel regarding the authority limits of the insurer's representative.

For further information, please contact: Jeffrey Michael Cohen at 305.539.7304.

Authored By
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.