Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Federal Court Issues $1 Million Contempt Award for Repeated Cell Phone Unlocking Misconduct
March 31, 2016

Cellphones

On March 18, United States District Judge Ursula Ungaro of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida entered an order against a  Hong Kong-based company that was improperly distributing prohibited cell phone unlocking solutions and imposed a damages award of $1 million. The case, TracFone Wireless, Inc. v. Technopark Co., Ltd., et al., 2016 WL 1127833 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 17, 2016), was originally filed by TracFone against Technopark on January 4, 2012. TracFone sued Technopark for its conduct related to the sale and distribution of devices capable of unlocking TracFone cell phones for use on other carriers’ wireless networks without TracFone’s authorization. TracFone subsequently obtained a final judgment and permanent injunction against Technopark, which prohibited the company from engaging in the sale or distribution of prohibited unlocking devices at any point in the future. 

In February 2016, after discovering that Technopark had renewed its illicit activities and was again engaging in the sale and distribution of a device capable of unlocking TracFone cell phones, TracFone moved to hold Technopark in contempt for its violation of the court’s permanent injunction. While Technopark is based in Hong Kong, it was working with companies around the world to carry out its improper activities, including one company based in South Florida. The court found that Technopark’s “Prohibited Unlocking Device Selling Scheme” violated the permanent injunction and held Technopark in contempt. The court granted TracFone’s motion, entered a damages award in favor of TracFone in the amount of $1 million, gave TracFone the opportunity to submit proof of additional damages.

TracFone’s substantial award is the latest of several Carlton Fields victories on behalf of many of the world’s largest wireless service providers seeking to prevent improper cell phone trafficking. Carlton Fields has represented telecommunications companies in hundreds of lawsuits against cell phone traffickers and unlockers across the country, resulting in nearly 200 final judgments and permanent injunctions, and over $800 million in damages awards.
Authored By
Image: Aaron S. Weiss
Aaron S. Weiss
Related Practices
Telecommunications
Related Industries
Telecommunications
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.