Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

Skip to Content

Parking Is Now A Taxable Expense

MeterIn the latest version of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that awaits the President’s signature, employers will be taxed on amounts spent after December 31, 2017 on employee parking. For-profit employers that deduct expenses may not deduct costs for employee parking. Similarly, employers that do not deduct expenses (i.e., tax-exempt and governmental entities) will be subject to unrelated business taxable income on the expenses they incur for employee parking. For each of these entities, the results are the same: if you pay your employees $X in compensation and spend $Y on their parking, you will be subject to taxation on $Y.

This may be good news to employers that require their employees to pay for their own parking, as more employers might shift to that model, but any employer that pays for or offsets the cost of employee parking is faced with the tough decision of incurring taxable expenses or passing the cost on to employees.

Potential Solutions

Employers that rent space from the same entity that owns the applicable parking facility might be able to renegotiate their lease in a way that includes free parking. Other employers that have been or are considering passing parking costs on to employees should consider establishing a “Qualified Transportation Compensation Reduction Plan.” These arrangements have a lot of flexibility, but here is one way they can be implemented:

Assume parking expenses are currently $260 per employee per month; an employer can establish an arrangement to permit employees to defer up to $260 per month into an account on a pretax basis to pay for parking; the employee may change their election on a monthly basis (so that if the employee is taking a vacation and will not incur all or the full parking expense, they can adjust their election; amounts not used up in one month roll over to the next; unused amounts that cannot be used because of a termination of employment are forfeited.

By establishing this pre-tax arrangement, employees that incur expenses enjoy a significant discount on their expenses. In addition, to the extent an employer is currently paying for parking, it can make this arrangement “revenue neutral” for current employees by increasing their compensation by the parking amount ($260 per month, in the above example). The employer gets the deduction for its full amount of employee compensation, and the use of a pretax parking arrangement means the employee’s taxable compensation remains unchanged.

Revealing the parking costs that were being absorbed by the employer might even trigger some additional employee appreciation — but don’t get your hopes up!

Timing

As with most types of reimbursement arrangements, a Qualified Transportation Compensation Reduction Plan may only reimburse expenses incurred after the arrangement is formally established. So employers that want to use such an arrangement as of January 1, 2018 must adopt one and allow employees to make elections before that date.

If you would like additional information about Qualified Transportation Compensation Reduction Plans, or have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the author of this blog or the Carlton Fields attorney with whom you usually communicate.

©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.