It can be difficult to decide whether to retain an e-discovery vendor if a company is unaware of what the organization can do and at what cost. Thus, knowledge of an organization’s e-discovery capabilities from the outset is important in making the vendor assessment.
Assess Vendor’s Capabilities
The e-discovery reference model includes various components from which a company can assess its specific capabilities. These components are:
A company may have the capabilities to excel in one area—such as identification and preservation—but may be lacking in terms of processing capabilities. Knowing the strengths and deficiencies from the beginning can help an organization select an appropriate vendor.
Assess Company’s Capabilities
Other issues to consider in examining a company’s strengths and deficiencies require an examination of:
- Whether IT personnel have time to focus on e-discovery issues
- Whether IT personnel would be good or bad witnesses if their depositions were taken
- Exposure potential of the litigation
- Type of data being collected.
If a company is facing significant exposure and IT personnel are not experienced in defending their work in litigation, it might be a good idea to hire an experienced vendor. If the e-discovery issues in the case are opinions rather than historical fact, an independent vendor witness may be more appropriate than an in-house witness. Furthermore, if legacy data (data stored in an old format that is difficult to access and is typically stored on a computer’s storage system) will be the subject of discovery, a vendor may be more appropriate because many companies lack the necessary software to read and process legacy data.
Consider Type of Service Needed
When a company decides to hire an e-discovery vendor there are a number of considerations that must be taken into account. First, consider the type of services that are needed in the litigation.
There are a number of different types of services such as:
- consulting and professional services
- data collection and processing
- data recovery and forensics
- hosting, review, production, and delivery
- litigation support
Use an RFP
In narrowing down the potential vendor to work with, consider utilizing a request for information or a request for project proposal (RFP).
The RFP should:
- define the problem
- explain the role of the client, counsel, and staff in the management of the work
- describe for the vendor the technical requirements
- address quality control issues
Do Your Due Diligence
Once a particular vendor is identified, it is necessary to perform due diligence regarding the vendor, in the following sequence:
- Consider the number of years the company has been in business, the track record of providing the product or service, insurance and license issues, confidentiality guarantees, and pricing methods.
- Gather information about the personnel who will be working on the case. It is necessary to screen the experience level of the employees and their ability to guarantee work by a specific date.
- Gather information concerning project security. The vendor should be able to describe what is done to ensure that a document has not been changed. The vendor should also be able to confirm that a complete, exact copy of the data is stored. It is also necessary to discuss the security of the data from hackers and viruses.
- Analyze conflicts issues from the beginning of the engagement. Vendors might be privy to confidential information regarding a client’s information management system. As a result, it is important to ensure that no conflicts are present from the outset. Also consider whether the vendor may have previously been retained by a competitor of the client.
Originally published on i-Sight.com's blog: “5 Tips for Hiring an E-Discovery Vendor in a Workplace Investigation”
© 2013 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.