Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Registration Relief for Some Delegating CPOs
September 16, 2014

In May, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) staff announced a streamlined process that allows persons seeking no-action relief to avoid registering as commodity pool operators (CPOs). They must, however, designate another person to serve as the registered CPO of the commodity pool at issue.

Staff Letter 14-69 sets forth the criteria that must be satisfied to use the streamlined approach, as well as the form of no-action request that must be submitted by the requesting CPO. While Letter 14-69 does not, by itself, provide no-action relief, the staff intends to issue responses to each request for relief made in compliance with that letter.

The applicable criteria are based on numerous requests the staff has received over the past several years. Generally, those requests have sought relief for a CPO that delegates its investment management authority over a commodity pool to another person (registered as a CPO) and does not solicit participants for, or manage property of, the applicable commodity pool. Under these circumstances, the staff has issued no-action relief, for example, regarding pools organized as limited partnerships or limited liability companies, such that an affiliated investment manager could serve as the registered CPO instead of the general partner or managing member.

In prior no-action positions for natural persons serving as members of the governing body of a commodity pool (mostly involving pools domiciled and located outside the United States), the staff generally has required the delegating and designated CPOs to agree to be jointly and severally liable for any commodity law violation that either commits regarding the pool. Letter 14-69 notably clarifies that the staff intends to provide relief for such members without requiring them to agree to joint and several liability if they are not affiliated with the designated CPO.
Authored By
Image: Edmund J. Zaharewicz
Edmund J. Zaharewicz
Related Practices
Securities Litigation and Enforcement
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.