Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

After Omnicare: Opinion Statement Liability in SEC Registrations
June 15, 2015

The U.S. Supreme Court in March provided important guidance on the support required for expressions of opinion or belief in registration statements. In Omnicare, Inc. v. Laborers District Council Construction Industry Pension Fund, the Court interpreted Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, which allows suits against the issuer of securities if the registration statement "contain[s] an untrue statement of material fact" or "omit[s] to state a material fact … necessary to make the statements therein not misleading," and held that an expression of opinion or belief does not in itself violate Section 11 unless the issuer subjectively believed the statement to be untrue or the statement included "embedded" statements of untrue facts.

But, writing for the Court, Justice Kagan explained that "we believe" and "we think" are not "magic words." Liability arises if the statement "omits material facts about the issuer’s inquiry into or knowledge concerning a statement of opinion, and if those facts conflict with what a reasonable investor would take from the statement itself."

For example, according to Justice Kagan, a CEO’s sincerely held claims about a product’s "superiority," when she "failed to review any of her competitors’ product specifications," would not be insulated from liability. Another example, in Kagan’s view, could be an issuer’s sincere belief in its compliance with applicable law, if stated "in the face of its lawyers’ contrary advice" that was not disclosed.

In light of Omnicare, it will be important to consider whether the level of certainty that a reasonable investor would, under all the circumstances, ascribe to a statement of opinion or belief is fairly aligned with the information then in the issuer’s possession. If not, it may be necessary to seek additional support for the statement or to omit, qualify, or otherwise revise it.

Much future litigation doubtless will turn on these questions, as the Court’s opinion provides little guidance on how its general principles should be applied in specific cases.
Authored By
Image: John E. Clabby
John E. Clabby
Related Practices
Securities Litigation and Enforcement
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.