Contributors
813.229.4304
407.244.8235
305.539.7371
813.229.4362
305.539.7309
305.539.7326
813.229.4324
561.822.2972
813.229.4957
561.650.8014
813.229.4308
305.539.7332
212.380.9612
305.539.7205
305.539.7330
561.650.0354
813.229.4251
407.244.8229
407.244.8226

Seventh Circuit


April 9, 2012 10:09 AM | Posted by D. Matthew Allen | Permalink
How detailed must a class certification order be? Can the court essentially “punt” on describing the class or defining the class issues to be tried? The Seventh Circuit answered those questions in the opinion described below. read more
April 6, 2012 10:07 AM | Posted by D. Matthew Allen | Permalink
Is a law firm seeking a portion of proceeds of a class action settlement a party for purposes of court approval of the attorney fee distribution? The Seventh Circuit says yes. Read on for details. read more
April 4, 2012 10:04 AM | Posted by D. Matthew Allen | Permalink
If a state agency (such as a Department of Education) systematically fails to comply with its statutory obligations, can a class action be used to remedy the failure? It used to be the case that the federal judiciary thought that structural injunctions taking control of executive functions was sensible. But that was then, this is now. What do the courts now think? Read on to find out the Seventh Circuit’s perspective on this policy question. read more
April 2, 2012 10:00 AM | Posted by D. Matthew Allen | Permalink
What happens when a plaintiff seeking class certification moves to exclude a defendant’s expert evidence on Daubert grounds? Can the district court allow the evidence to be admitted and “take it for what it is worth” in deciding the certification question? Read on to see what the Seventh Circuit said about this question. read more
January 4, 2012 11:27 PM | Posted by Adam Koppel | Permalink
According to a recent opinion by the Seventh Circuit, the answer is no.

read more