Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

Skip to Content

Executives in Crosshairs for Corporate Violations

A new U.S. Department of Justice policy expands expectations for corporate cooperation in white collar investigations in ways that have profound implications for SEC-regulated entities such as broker dealers, investment advisers, and others in the securities industry. This new policy:

  • creates additional obstacles for any company attempting to resolve cases with the DOJ;
  • places increased pressure on companies to develop and present evidence of wrongdoing by senior executives and other employees in order to get credit for cooperation; and
  • puts additional pressure on prosecutors to charge individuals and thereby increase the exposure of corporate executives to government scrutiny.

While it remains to be seen how this new policy, issued in memo form by Deputy Attorney General Sally Q. Yates on September 9, 2015, will play out, it is certain that SEC-regulated entities should be mindful of it and pay close attention to its application as the DOJ and the SEC implement it. Policy changes include the following:

  • To be eligible for any cooperation credit, corporations must provide to the DOJ all relevant facts about the individuals involved in corporate misconduct.
  • Both criminal and civil corporate investigations by the government should focus on individuals from the inception of the investigation.
  • Criminal and civil attorneys handling corporate investigations for the government should be in routine communication with one another and in most cases should discuss civil referrals when a prosecutor decides not to pursue a criminal case.
  • Absent extraordinary circumstances, no corporate resolution of alleged illegality will provide protection from criminal or civil liability for any individuals involved.
  • Corporate cases should not be resolved without a clear plan to resolve related individual cases before the statute of limitations expires, and the reasons for any declinations to pursue individuals in such cases must be memorialized.
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.