Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

Skip to Content

Final Volcker Regulations Ease Mutual Fund Concerns

Adopted in December 2013, the final interagency rulemaking to implement the Volcker Rule resolves a number of concerns raised by the mutual fund industry. Under the Volcker Rule, banking entities are generally prohibited from engaging in proprietary trading or investing in or sponsoring certain types of investment funds. Such "covered funds," as the regulations call them, generally include any issuer that would be an investment company but for Section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act, as well as certain commodity pools.

By expressly excluding registered investment companies from the definition of a covered fund, the final regulations clarify that a registered investment company will not be treated as a covered fund even if the company is also considered a commodity pool. This benefits certain registered investment companies that use futures, swaps, or other commodity interests in their investment programs. The final regulations also address the problem that could arise for an issuer that is reasonably expected to become a registered investment company, but during its "seeding" period relies on Section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7). Specifically, the regulations also exclude such seeding vehicles from the definition of a covered fund, subject to certain conditions designed to prevent evasion of the general prohibitions on covered fund activities.

In addition, the final regulations make clear that the Volcker Rule generally will not affect the ability of registered investment companies to invest in a covered fund, unless the registered investment company is itself a banking entity by virtue of being an affiliate of an insured depository institution. In this regard, the adopting release discusses in some detail the considerable extent to which a banking entity may invest in or maintain certain relationships (for instance, as an adviser or organizer, sponsor, and manager) with a registered investment company without the Volcker Rule prohibiting the company’s investment in any covered fund.

©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.