Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of July 23 -27, 2018
July 28, 2018

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

NE 32nd Street v. US - Quiet Title Act, limitations
US v. Watts - robbery, right to testify, sentencing
Daughtrey v. Rivera - bankruptcy
Lewis v. Ala - Ala Minimum Wage Act, equal protection

Florida Supreme Court – Tallahassee

No decisions this week

First District Court of Appeal – Tallahassee

Scott v. Trotti - judicial vacancy, appointment, election
Rivet v. State - murder, circumstantial evidence; Williams rule
Gartman v. State - double jeopardy
Cooper v. State - preservation of error
Alfred v. Barfield - pro se sanctions
Carter v. State - postconviction relief
Sowell v. Faith Christian - prohibition; tax exemption challenge
Fla Ass'n of Homes v. AHCA - administrative review, emergency rules
SG v. State - delinquency, resisting without violence
Anderson v. Broward Sheriff - workers' compensation

Second District Court of Appeal – Lakeland

State v. Zachery - search and seizure
Moody v. State - search and seizure
Super Products v. Intracoastal - fee award, appellate jurisdiction
Marzullo v. Marzullo - appellate jurisdiction
Hawks v. Libit - prevailing party costs

Third District Court of Appeal – Miami

Gering v. State - Jimmy Ryce Rules, directed verdict
State v. Garcia - § 934.06, surreptitious recordings
US Bank v. Amaya - foreclosure, limitations, res judicata
US Bank v. Ramirez - foreclosure, limitations
Jay v. State - postconviction relief
Brown v. BNB Inv - personal jurisdiction, service of process
Dixon v. Dixon Bellamy - paternity
Martinez v. Taurus Int'l - gun manufacturers, immunity
Martin v. State - postconviction relief
Franco v. Thomas - rule 1.540, legal error
Nationstar v. Roque - foreclosure, redemption
Brown v. State - postconviction relief
Watts v. State - postconviction relief
Westberry v. State - habeas corpus

Fourth District Court of Appeal – West Palm Beach

Fournier v. Calvo - attorney's fees
Weeks v. Palm Beach - defamation; statute of limitations
Defilippo v. Curtin - statutory violation; negligence; causation; Fabre
Delopa v. State - probation revocation
Abt v. Metro Motors - attorney's charging lien
Renny v. Bertoloti - enforcement; settlement agreement
Schneider v. First Amer Bank - foreclosure; remedies
Bentz v. State - right to counsel
Vaughn v. Vaughn - martial assets; distribution
Newman v. Mayer Brown - discovery; de facto parties
Parkmond v. Bank of NY Mellon - service of process
Lopez v. Hernandez - marital dissolution
People's Trust Ins. V. Tracey - insurance; appraisal
Southern Wall Products v. Bolin - personal jurisdiction; minimum contacts
Broward School Board v. CNN - public records; criminal investigation; video
Fleury v. State - bail condition; bond; source of funds

Fifth District Court of Appeal – Daytona Beach

Deutsche Bank v. Green - foreclosure, statute of limitations
Jackson v. State - plea, competency
Robinson v. State - sentencing, juvenile
Edwards v. State - sentencing, juvenile
McNeil v. Jenkins-McNeil - dissolution, Florida residency
Moss v. Estate of Hudson - quash service, substituted
State v. Grate - quo warranto; public defender, intervention
State v. Skinner - quo warranto; public defender, intervention
State v. Office of PD (18th Cir) - quo warranto; public defender, intervention
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.