Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of May 14 - 18, 2018

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Williams v. Mosaic Fertilizer - toxic tort, Daubert 
US v. Knowles - identity theft, unauthorized access 
Ovalles v. US - en banc 
Chmielewski v. City of St Pete Beach - condemnation 
Prison Legal News v. Fla DOC - 1st Amendment, due process 
Sopo v. US Atty Gen - habeas corpus, mootness


Florida Supreme Court – Tallahassee

FROP v. Miami - union, financial urgency, constitutional challenge 
Walton v. State - capital case, postconviction relief 
Koppel v. Ochoa - rule 1.090, settlement proposal, extension of time 
Sierra Club v. Brown - electric utility rates, settlement 
Alston v. State - capital case, postconviction relief 
Andrews v. State - ex parte pro se filings, pro bono counsel


First District Court of Appeal – Tallahassee

Stoffel v. State - molestation, lesser included, battery 
Copeland v. State - search and seizure 
O'Steen v. State - postconviction relief 
Brown v. State - suppression order, no findings 
Highwoods v. Milar - indemnification, Mary Carter settlement 
Crenshaw v. State - grant theft, intent; moot sentencing appeal 
Robinson v. State - double jeopardy 
Thompson v. State - probation revocation 
Johnson v. State - double jeopardy 
Archie v. State - appellate jurisdiction 
Sherman v. State - double jeopardy 
Dygart v. State - double jeopardy 
Kellum v. State - newly discovered evidence 
Rodriguez v. Nicolitz - medical malpractice, presuit notice 
Harbor Freight v. Whitehead - workers' compensation 
Boulineau v. DHSMV - second-tier certiorari, driver's license revocation


Second District Court of Appeal – Lakeland

Jennings v. State - sentencing 
Brooks v. State - confession, admissibility 
DD v. State - delinquency, theft, value 
Myers v. State - postconviction relief 
Raissi v. Valente - condominium expenses, summary judgment 
Persaud v. Persaud - alimony, child support 
State Farm v. MRI Assoc - PIP, medical expenses, certified question 
3d Fed S&L v. Koulouvaris - foreclosure, authentication


Third District Court of Appeal – Miami

Roberts v. State - requested opinion, preservation 
Pacheco v. Gonzalez - rule 1.442, settlement proposal 
Hernandez v. State - sentencing 
State Farm v. Xirinachs - insurance, law of the case 
Lindemuth v. State - interfering with custody, entice 
TM Wireless v. All Commerce - sales contract or joint venture 
Semerena v. Aetna - voluntary dismissal after court-ordered dismissal 
Miami v. Miami FROP - unfair labor practice 
Perlberg v. Lubercy Asia - appellate jurisdiction 
Bajcar v. Bajcar - certiorari, contempt 
Rivero v. Farach - certiorari, confidential records


Fourth District Court of Appeal – West Palm Beach

Vassor v. State - premeditation 
Chavis v. State - sentencing; costs 
Pierre v. State - preservation 
Walker v. State - oral pronouncement 
McGraw v. State - certified question; blood draw; consent 
Charles v. State - competency 
Fla Research Inst v. Dillon - membership; termination; notice 
McCullough v. State - postconviction relief 
Henion v. State - sentencing 
De La Rosa v. Fla Peninsula Ins - timely report; prejudice 
Fazio v. Fazio - marital settlement agreement 
Sealy v. Sealy - mediated settlement agreement; remedy 
Davis v. Davis - dissolution; findings 
Scarcinci v. Christiana Trust - foreclosure; standing; damages 
Hernandez v. State - competency 
Molina v. Valenzuela - injunction; stalking; mootness 
Heard v. Perales - imputed income 
Buhler v. State - speedy trial rule 
Haspel v. State - postconviction relief 
State v. Kersting - presence; criminal proceeding


Fifth District Court of Appeal – Daytona Beach

Madl v. Wells Fargo - attorney's fees; contract 
RR v. New Life Comm Church - limitations; negligence 
Hicks v. Am Integrity Ins - PCA; precedential value 
Burney v. State - competence; stipulation 
Blocker v. State - postconviction relief 
Doby v. State - belated appeal 
Hill v. Hill - disqualification
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.