Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of April 22 - 26, 2019

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

US v. Pavlenko - standing
Fresh Results v. ASF Holland - forum non conveniens
Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier - class action settlement, FACTA
Security Walls v. NLRB - NRLA
Inprotsa v. Del Monte Intl - international arbitration
Hard Candy v. Anastasia Beverly Hills - trademark, Seventh Amendment
Sears v. Roberts - § 1983, summary judgment standard

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Barber v. State - pro se sanctions
Citizens of Fla v. Brown - utility costs, FP&L
Israel v. DeSantis - quo warranto, sheriff suspension

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

So Baptist Hosp v. AHCA - rule challenge, Medicaid reimbursements
Davis v. State - en banc, sentencing, lack of remorse, certified question
Milton v. State - competency
Tolbert v. State - criminal restitution
Wells v. State - premature appeal
Fernanders v. State - severance
MBC Gospel Net v. Fla News - promissory note, original
Levin v. State - postconviction relief
Thompson v. State - postconviction relief
King v. State - probation revocation
Sapp v. State - sentencing
Delon v. State - postconviction relief
Boyd v. State - probation violation
Browner v. Browner - premature appeal

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Elder v. State - motion to enforce mandate
Feaster v. State - Stand Your Ground, certified conflict
Old Dominion v. Tipton - rule 1.442, settlement proposal, neutral evaluation
RMA v. JAS - paternity, child support, fees
Hills Sch Bd v. Woodford - certiorari, whistle-blower claim, dismissal denial
Nipper v. Suncoast Credit - summary judgment standard, collection case
AD v. DCF - parental rights, termination
Bermudez Gomez v. State - plea withdrawal, trial court jurisdiction
Dipasquale v. Dipasquale - marital settlement agreement
Horton v. State - Stand Your Ground, certified conflict
Champagne v. State - sentencing, certified question
Mott v. DeSoto Sch Bd - school expulsion, zero tolerance policy
Dominguez v. Dominguez - certiorari, discovery, law firm records
Hiraldo v. State - sentencing
Crandall v. State - sentencing

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

OneWest Bank v. Palmero - en banc, foreclosure, reverse mortgage, condition precedent
All Seasons CA v. Patrician Hotel - specific performance, condominium building, agency, statute of frauds
CEC Ent v. Zaldivar - closing argument, fundamental error
Fresnedo v. Porky's Gym - release
Estrada v. Estrada - rule 1.540, void judgment
Quinoes v. State - pawnshop ownership verification, stolen property
Martin v. State - double jeopardy
De Diego v. Barrios - equitable lien, homestead
Megacenter US v. Goodman Doral - sales contract, real property
Safirstein v. DOH - physician, license revocation
Northwind Air v. Terra's Garden - personal jurisdiction
TM v. State - evidence, 911 audio
Clark v. Celebrity Cruises - forum selection clause
DD v. State - probation revocation
Rodriguez v. State - closing argument
Johnson v. State - pro se sanction
Epstein v. Brunel - service of process
Filomia v. RAAC - Applegate affirmance
Miami Dade Col v. del Pino Allen - certiorari, deposition, apex doctrine
Stanley v. Ramsay - pro se sanctions
Forte v. Miami-Dade Cnty - second-tier certiorari, historic designation
Shir Law v. Carnevale - certiorari, discovery, electronic data
Torres v. State - rule 9.141, ineffective assistance, timeliness

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Estape v. Seidman - psychologist-patient; litigation privilege
Carnahan v. Novell - limine motion; waiver; proffer
Perera v. Diolife - oral modification; written contract
Florez v. Broward Sheriff - negligence; false arrest
Florida Inv Grp 100 v. Lafont - contract interpretation
Edelman v. Citizens Prop Ins - summary judgment evidence
Event Depot v. Frank - punitive damages; certiorari
State v. Morris - auto license frame; s. 316.605(1)
Bank of NY v. Fla Kalanit 770 - foreclosure; allonge, date

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Rodriguez v. State - habeas corpus, pretrial release
Smith v. Rodriguez - non-reliance provision, contract; fraud, chapter 475
Jones v. State - judicial immunity
Williams v. State - postconviction relief
Shelko v. State - sentencing, fundamental error
Shamrock-Shamrock v. Remark - nonparty, duty to preserve evidence
Rogers v. State - probation revocation, written order
Antinarelli v. State - probation violation
Cole v. State - sentencing
Dennis v. State - Spencer warning
Mann v. State - belated appeal, certiorari
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.