Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of April 6 - 10, 2020

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

US v. Oliver - sentencing, ACCA
US v. Maher - conspiracy, continuing offenses
In re Bay Circle Props - standing
US v. Caniff - notice seeking child pornography
Lawson-Ross v. Great Lakes Higher Ed - Higher Ed Act, preemption

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

In re COVID-19 - bar rules, amendments

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Risech v. State - witness harassment; peremptory strike, preservation
Hudson v. State - premeditation
MTGLQ Inv v. Moore - foreclosure, unclean hands
Russell v. Russell - marital dissolution
Thrift v. State - vehicular homicide, intent
Lyons v. State - sentencing
Davis v. State - search and seizure
Simmons v. State - postconviction relief
Cabezas v. Corcoran - educator certificate, administrative review
Pumphrey v. DCF - Medicaid, administrative review, due process
Hernandez-Paz v. State - attempted sexual battery
OG v. State - juvenile sentencing
Timmons v. Lake City Golf - arbitration, confirmation; final judgment
Toliver v. State - postconviction relief
Sinclair v. Pease - appellate jurisdiction

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Porter v. Chronister - post-judgment jurisdiction
Bryan v. State - probation revocation

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

HMC Assets v. Williams - foreclosure, res judicata
Miami Bch v. Fla Gas - appellate jurisdiction
Humes v. Solanki - pro se sanctions, due process
Ruozzi v. Wulff - appellate jurisdiction
Zaidman v. Zaidman - probate, competing wills
Granoff & Kessler v. Glass - attorney's fees, expert testimony
Rhonda Hollander PA v. Adrien - certiorari, litigation privilege, collection
AD v. DCF - dependency
Moskovits v. MTGLQ Inv - foreclosure, standing, leave to amend
Katz-Luongo v. Amortegui - service of process

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Kramer v. State - self-incrimination
Dean v. State - resentencing
Graham v. Randolph Constr Gp - fundamental error
Drennan v. State - competency, written order
Bruni v. State - competency
Publix v. Olivares - disqualification
Sun Coast Nursing Centers v. Littman - personal jurisdiction
State v. Fredericks - warrantless vehicle search
Washington v. State - sentencing

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Fruehwirth v. State - sentence; certified conflict, certified question
Charles v. State - burglary, costs
Conley v. State - Anders appeal, costs
Silsby v. State - Anders appeal, probation
Dunnell v. State - postconviction relief
Dept of Ag v. Mahon - certiorari, inverse condemnation
Green v. State - postconviction relief
Dill v. State - Spencer warning, pro se
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.