Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of July 27 - 31, 2020

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

USA v. Melgen - fraud, materiality instruction; evidence, summaries
AEGIS Elec v. ECI Mgmt - insurance, covered loss, attorney's fees
Clemons v. Ala DOC - postconviction relief
Patel v. Hamilton Med Cntr - declaratory judgment, immunity, subject matter jurisdiction
USA v. Smith - evidence, witness identification, video; Hobbs Act, evidence, instructions
Gogel v. KIA Motors - employment, Title VII, retaliation, en banc
Lavigne v. Addy - Herbalife class action, arbitration, venue
Goode v. Soc Sec Comm'r - Social Security benefits

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

No decisions this week.

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Charley v. State - search and seizure
Carrell v. State - habeas corpus
Lang v. DOH - physician license, administrative review
Wilson v. State - sentencing
Lohstreter v. DOH - physician license, administrative review

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Whitham v. State - Stand Your Ground
Bolliger v. Fries - marital dissolution, fees
Baker v. State - postconviction relief
Marenco v. Marenco - child support
Ballard v. Bank of Am - foreclosure, sanctions, Kozel
Welch v. State - probation revocation
Patterson v. State - postconviction relief

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

JJ v. State - search and seizure, constructive possession, en banc
Neighb'hood Planning v. DOT - eminent domain, damages
Ward v. State - violation of pretrial ruling, evidence
Luckman v. Wills - wrongful death, duty of care, expert opinion
Brown v. State - probation violation; appellate jurisdiction
Wilson v. State - postconviction relief, procedural confusion, fashioned relief
Gore v. Smith - child support, expert costs
Ferguson v. State - postconviction relief
Palace Resorts v. Flynn - forum non conveniens
Lavance v. State - appellate jurisdiction

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

RJ Reynolds v. State - contractual liability
Evans v. State - due process; VFOSC
Roberts v. Third Palm - real estate agent, compensation
Pittman v. State - competency
Patchen v. Quadomain Condo Assn - injunction; bond
Harkness v. Harness - durational alimony
Kelly v. Green Tree Servicing - lien priority
B&L Service v. Broward County - attorney's fees; public records
Ponomarenko v. Esenova - dissolution, disqualification
Gonzalez v. Funes - protection injunction
Randolph v. State - probation violation, written findings
Ark Real Estate v. 21st Mort Corp - foreclosure, surviving lien

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Gomez-Arroyo v. State - Anders, scrivener's error
Volusia County v. Bank of NY - foreclosure, equitable subrogee
Bradley v. State - competency, independent determination
Johns v. State - postconviction relief
Annicchiarico v. State- postconviction relief
Font v. State - probation violation, written order
Quinby v. State - Anders, costs
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.