Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

SEC Probes Fund Section 15(c) Process
March 02, 2023
SEC Probes Fund Section 15(c) Process

The Staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), last spring, sent letters
(SEC Staff Requests) to selected mutual funds (funds) requesting specified written information
about their process for evaluating and approving investment advisory contracts (advisory contracts) under Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act of 19401 (1940 Act) (Section 15(c) process). The SEC Staff Requests did not explain their purpose or context. However, William A. Birdthistle, Director of the SEC’s Division of Investment Management, last March expressed2 concern about the efficacy of the Section 15(c) process regarding funds with low investment performance (poor returns) and/or high fees, particularly poor returns over long periods. Director Birdthistle then spoke3 informally about this concern before professional groups during 2022. This article begins with a summary of Director Birdthistle’s expressed concern. The article then: summarizes the Section 15(c) process, SEC enforcement actions, and the SEC Staff Requests; notes that the SEC Staff did not announce the process as an exam priority; explains how the SEC Staff Requests may reflect the views of SEC Chair Gary Gensler and Director Birdthistle as expressed in their respective books; and addresses the downward trend in fund expense ratios perhaps due to price competition spurred by SEC disclosure requirements. 

Click here to read the full article.
Authored By
Image: Gary O. Cohen
Gary O. Cohen
Related Practices
Financial Services Regulatory
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.