- Ford Motor Co. v. Hall-Edwards, 971 So. 2d 854 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). Reversing jury verdict based on improper admission of other accident evidence and evidence of subsequent remedial measures.
- Kish v. A.W. Chesterton Company, et. al., 930 So. 2d 704 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). Affirming summary judgment based on statute of repose on fraud. Koulianos v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, 962 So. 2d 357 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). Affirming summary judgment based on statute of repose on fraud.
- Grunow v. Valor Corp. of Florida, 904 So. 2d 551 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). Relationship between product defect and negligence in wrongful death, products liability action arising from murder of a teacher by a student.
- General Motors Corp. v. Porritt, 891 So. 2d 1056 (Fla. 2nd DCA 2004). Admissibility of demonstrative test and standards for admissibility of expert testimony.
- Hockensmith v. Ford Motor Company, Case No. 03-13729 (11th Cir. 2004). Issues concerning jury instructions and the admissibility of statistical evidence in a wrongful death action.
- Tableau Fine Art Group v. Jacoboni, 853 So. 2d 299 (Fla. 2003). Standard for recusal of trial judge.
- Dourado v. Ford Motor Company, 843 So. 2d 913 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). Admissibility of medical bills in a wrongful death action.
- Williams v. Potamkin Motor Cars, Inc., 835 So. 2d 310 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). Class action requirements and Magnuson-Moss Act.
- Scheman-Gonzalez v. Saber Manuf. Co., 816 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). Definition of design defect and defect by virtue of the failure to warn.
- Oller v. Ford Motor Co., 265 F.3d 1062 (11th Cir. 2001) (table opinion). Admissibility of expert testimony and definition of design defect.
- D'Amario v. Ford Motor Company, 806 So. 2d 424 (Fla. 2001). The role of comparative fault in a crashworthiness case.
- Jackson v. General Motors Corp., 60 S.W. 3d 800 (Tenn. 2001) (amicus brief). Definition of product defect.
- Ford Motor Company v. Meyers, 771 So. 2d 1202 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). Attorneys fees pursuant to offer of judgment.
- Marlin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 761 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). Issues relating to the relationship between insurers, their insureds and attorneys retained by insurers representing insureds, and contractual duties owed pursuant to insurance policies.
- Bell Sports, Inc. v. Yarusso, 759 A. 2d 582 (Del. 2000). Admissibility of expert testimony and inconsistent verdicts.
- Almeida v. FMC Corp.. 740 So. 2d 557 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). Failure to prosecute.
- American First Federal, Inc. v. Lake Forest Park, Inc., 198 F.3d 1259 (11th Cir. 1999). Exhaustion of remedies under the federal Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act ("FIRREA") and enforceability of promissory notes.
- Santana v. Reliastar Life Insurance Co., 732 So. 2d 1078 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1999). Interpleader requirements.
- Goulah v. Ford Motor Company, 118 F.3d 1478 (11th Cir. 1997). Jury instructions, comparative fault, destruction of evidence.
- Ciba-Geigy, Ltd. v. Fish Peddler, Inc., 691 So. 2d 1111 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (amicus brief). Forum non conveniens.
- Jenkins v. Budd Co., 689 So. 2d 426 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1997). Statute of repose.
- Hoover v. Bell Sports, Inc., 103 F.3d 147 (11th Cir. 1996) (table opinion). Expert testimony.
|
