Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

NCOIL Revises Unclaimed Property Model Act
March 25, 2015

The National Conference of Insurance Legislators (NCOIL) recently adopted an enhanced Model Unclaimed Life Insurance Benefits Act to address particular concerns regarding the Social Security Death Master File (the DMF). The first iteration of that Model Act was passed by NCOIL in 2011 and subsequently adopted by 15 states.

The updated model requires life insurers to search, "on at least a semi-annual basis, by using the full Death Master File once and thereafter using the Death Master File update files for future comparisons." The previous model, by contrast, required life insurers to search the full DMF twice a year. The revised model also includes new definitions. "Knowledge of death," for example, has been defined by the Act to mean either receipt of an original or valid copy of a certified death certificate, or a DMF match validated by the insurer.

The amendments also clarify the model’s substantive provisions. The model provides that contractual interest is payable to beneficiaries or owners, or to the state in the event of escheat, but that interest payable only under the state’s statutory interest law will not escheat to the state as unclaimed property. Violations of the Act constitute a violation of the state’s Unfair Trade Practices Act (UTPA), though the drafters noted that "care should be taken … to ensure consistency across [the] two statutes" when the state’s UTPA requires that the act be a pattern or practice prior to finding a violation. Finally, the revised model provides that the act will take effect no less than one year after the date signed into law.

Rep. George Keiser (ND), Unclaimed Property Task Force Co-Chair, stated that the "updated model evidences successful compromise between differing, often opposing, perspectives, including those of life insurers, regulators, unclaimed property officials and consumer representatives."
Related Practices
Life, Annuity, and Retirement Litigation
Related Industries
Life, Annuity, and Retirement Solutions
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.