Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

Skip to Content

Moving for Remand: When Have You Lost Your Chance?

If you actively litigate your removed case in federal court before timely moving to remand, do you waive the right to remand? It depends on the Circuit. A February 2016 decision from the Southern District of West Virginia highlights the importance of knowing the rules that apply in the Circuit in which you litigate.

In Central West Virginia Regional Airport Authority, Inc. v. Triad Engineering, Inc., No. 2:15-cv-11818, 2016 WL 685086 (S.D. W. Va. Feb. 18, 2016), the defendant opposed the plaintiff’s motion to remand the case to the state court, asserting that the plaintiff had waived his right by filing several documents in the federal court, including a motion to dismiss, various stipulations, and discovery. In support, the defendant cited to two district court cases that adopted the Eighth Circuit’s holding that a plaintiff waives its right to remand when it litigates its case in federal court.

Rejecting the defendant’s argument, the court noted that the Fourth Circuit – the circuit in which the court sat – has not adopted the Eighth Circuit’s rule. Contrary to the Eighth Circuit rule, the court held that precedent from the Fourth Circuit suggests the opposite would be true – “that a timely filed motion for remand renders the waiver doctrine inapplicable.” Id. at *16 (citing King v. Marriott Int’l, Inc., 337 F.3d 421 (4th Cir. 2003)). Based on this authority, the court held the plaintiff had not waived its right to seek remand.

 

Preservation Issue:

In certain circuits, a party waives its right to remand a case to state court when it actively litigates its case in federal court prior to moving to remand.

Tips:

Know the rules that apply in your Circuit. While the plaintiff in Triad Engineering successfully remanded its case to state court, a similarly situated plaintiff in the Eighth Circuit, for example, would have waived its right to remand by litigating its case in federal court before timely moving to remand.

And if some pleading is required before the time for remand, such as the deadline to file an answer, consider including in the pleading an express caveat that the filing is to satisfy the requirements of the rule and not a waiver of the right to seek remand.

Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.