Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

Skip to Content

For Want Of A Deadline: Avoiding A Jurisdictional Pitfall

Tips

The time for appealing from an order, whether final or non-final, is typically jurisdictional. If the appellant or petitioner misses the applicable deadline, the appellate court lacks jurisdiction to review the order on appeal. Consequently, it is important to be especially attentive, even overly cautious, regarding deadlines for filing appeals. Indeed, the best approach is generally to calculate, confirm, and re-confirm the applicable deadline, and then file and serve the notice of appeal a couple of days before the actual deadline.

Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Guy v. Plaza Home Mortg., Inc., No. 4D17-3335, --- So. 3d ----, 2018 WL 1953106 (Fla. 4th Dist. Ct. App. Apr. 25, 2018), highlights the importance of exercising extra caution. Under Florida’s Rules of Appellate Procedure, the time for an appeal runs from rendition of an order, which is the time when the clerk actually receives the signed, written order, not the earlier time at which the trial judge signed the filing. The Broward County Clerk, however, had been backdating foreclosure judgments to reflect the date on which the trial judge originally signed them, rather than when the clerk received the signed, written judgment. 

Although it had not affected the appellant in the case, the Guy court nevertheless disapproved of the practice of the backdating judgments for docketing purposes. Not only was it contrary to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, the court noted that it could potentially prejudice appellants by shortening the deadlines by which they must appeal.  

Preservation Issue and Tip

While the appellant in Guy thankfully had not lost his right to appeal, another appellant might have. To ensure that you meet jurisdictional deadlines, and to avoid the extra stress and expense that missing a deadline can add to the appellate process, exercise caution. When calculating the date on which a notice of appeal must be filed, use the earliest potential date of rendition and then, just to be safe, file and serve your notice of appeal a couple of days before that.

©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.