Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

SEC Reconsiders Exchange-Traded Products
September 28, 2015

The SEC recently published myriad questions about the listing, trading, and marketing (especially to retail investors) of "new, novel, or complex" exchange-traded products (ETPs). Such ETPs include exchange-traded funds (ETFs), certain pooled investment vehicles that do not invest primarily in securities, and exchange-traded notes.

ETPs have grown and evolved enormously since 1992, when the SEC approved the first ETP, the SPDR S&P 500 ETF. Not surprisingly, the SEC also has received more—and more complex—requests by ETP issuers for relief to allow ETPs to be listed on securities exchanges and requests by securities exchanges to establish listing standards for new types of ETPs.

Now, however, the SEC is revisiting the basic question of whether effective and efficient "arbitrage mechanisms" exist to help ensure that secondary market prices of ETPs closely track the value of their underlying portfolio or reference assets.

The SEC also is making inquiries concerning:

  • how potentially manipulative conduct in the distribution of ETPs can best be prevented;
  • the extent to which the positions of the SEC and its staff that are reflected in existing ETP exemptive and no-action relief under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 remain appropriate, given the increasing complexity and diversity of ETP investment strategies, underlying and reference assets, and benchmarks;
  • how retail broker-dealers satisfy their sales practice and suitability obligations to investors with respect to ETPs; and
  • the extent to which retail investors are informed about, and understand, the nature and operation of ETPs.

Prior SEC concept releases have focused on the operation of ETFs registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the exemptive relief that ETFs require under that act. The SEC now seeks to engage the public on the treatment of all ETPs, a broader group of products, with respect to Securities Exchange Act regulation.
Authored By
Image: Thomas C. Lauerman
Thomas C. Lauerman
Related Practices
Securities Litigation and Enforcement
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.