U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
Raheem v. Warden - ineffective assistance of counsel
Fisher v. US - premise liability
Losch v. Experian - FCRA
US v. Riley - sentencing
US v. Pacheo-Romero - attorney fees
Salinero v. Johnson & Johnson - products liability, learned intermediary doctrine
Paresky v. US - jurisdiction, taxes, overpayment interest
Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee
In re Fla R Civ P 1.510 - new summary judgment rule
CN v. IGC - timesharing, modification, concrete steps
First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee
Haim v. State - identification, prejudicial evidence, sentencing
Louis v. State - lesser-included offenses, instructions
Strickland v. State Farm - summary judgment, mootness, apportionment
Bracht v. State - return of property
Ferguson v. State - postconviction relief
Abney v. State - postconviction relief
Scott v. DeSantis - election, ballot, mootness
Stokes v. Jones - prohibition, trust accounting, discovery
Davenport v. State - sentencing
Gibbs v. Gibbs - alimony modification, contempt
Houk v. State - double jeopardy
Seadler v. Marina Bay CA - jury selection
Seadler v. Marina Bay CA - § 768.79, appellate attorney's fees
Martinez v. State - postconviction relief
Turem v. DOC - appellate jurisdiction
Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland
AH v. AB - child support, findings
JGJ v. JH - timesharing, contempt
Carnes v. State - sentencing
Stern v. US Bank - appellate jurisdiction
Idelson v. Carmer - parenting plan, modification, findings
Terrell v. State - jail credit
Hastings v. State - jail credit
Bean v. Response Ins - rehearing PCA
Fountain v. State - sexual abuse, prior inconsistent statement
Third District Court of Appeal - Miami
Royal Caribbean v. Spearman - final judgment, expert, remittur
Gregorian International v. Thormahlen - forum non conveniens
Priority Medical v. Allstate - summary judgment
Maxzak v. Walgreen - summary judgment, counterevidence
Advanced Physical Therapy v. Camrac - settlement proposal, fee cap
Casa Del Mar v. Key Biscayne Fire Rescue - certiorari, procedural due process
Barak v. ACS - sanctions
Geico v. Finlay - summary judgment
Nunez v. Aviv Air - summary judgment, commercial lease
Cruz v. Neely - probate, distribution order, standing
Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach
Stewart v. State - plea withdrawal
Marchelos v. Adao - civil usury
Martinez v. State - restitution, theft
Emanuel v. Costco - consortium claim, costs
Thane v. Rose Acceptance - foreclosure, service, waiver
State v. Cremers - prosecution, costs
Coffy v. Coffy - child support, mediation agreement
Moncadagonzalez v. State - sentencing
Raja v. State - double jeopardy, merger, single homicide
Valby v. Valby - alimony, duration
Castro v. People's Trust Ins - insurance, s. 627.7011, repair
Villalba v. Villalba - timesharing, child support
Margate v. New Urban - sovereign immunity, land use
Sirgutz v. Sirgutz - Antenuptial Agreement, alimony, NY law
Coffield v. State - new charge, adversary preliminary hearing
Jing v. State - misdemeanor presence, resisting arrest
Quest v. Haynie - default, excusable neglect
Lake Pointe v. Coleman - status conference, dismissal, notice
Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach
Velez v. Lafontaine - contempt; child timesharing, support
©2026 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.
