Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Using Post-Trial Motions to Argue Error for the First Time
April 17, 2019
Preservation of Error Tips

Among the many benefits of utilizing appellate counsel at trial is that appellate counsel can assist in timely raising possible errors, and if error is not asserted when it occurs, then appellate counsel may be able to raise the issue at another point in the trial or even through post-trial motions. Post-trial motions, though, can be particularly challenging when it comes to asserting error for the first time.

Cougar Canyon Loan, LLC v. Cypress Fund, LLC, No. 20170413-CA, 2019 WL 1388786 (Utah Ct. App. Mar. 28, 2019), a recent decision from the Utah Court of Appeals, helps illustrate the point. Following an adverse verdict on securities fraud claims, the defendant moved for a new trial, arguing that a statute of limitations barred the claim because a corporate agent's early knowledge of the fraud should have been imputed to the plaintiff corporation, but the jury was not instructed on that point of law. That argument had not been previously raised.

Unfortunate for the defendant, the trial court denied the defendant's post-trial motions and did so without addressing the merits of the limitations argument. The appellate court explained that, as a result, the challenge was not preserved. Utah law permits an argument to be raised for the first time in a new trial motion, but if the trial court does not reach the merits, including if the court finds the issue waived, then it is not preserved for appeal. The appellate court proceeded to examine the argument under Utah's plain error doctrine and ruled that the higher showing required for plain error had not been made.

Could the defendant have done something to nudge the trial court to address the merits of the limitations argument? We cannot know. We can suggest that if appellate counsel is participating at the post-trial stage and appreciates the need for the trial court to reach an otherwise unpreserved error, there may be steps that counsel can take to improve the chances that the trial court does so.

Practice Tip

When preparing post-trial motions, involve appellate counsel, who can assess the jurisdiction's preservation rules. If a point is being raised for the first time in post-trial motions and the trial court must reach its merits for it to be preserved for appeal, then appellate counsel should assist in crafting and presenting the argument in the manner that maximizes the chances that the trial court does so.
Authored By
Image: Matthew J. Conigliaro
Matthew J. Conigliaro
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support Litigation and Trials
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.