Beyond Soundbites: Navigating Complex Permitting Challenges

Energy and Utilities   |   Environmental Regulation & Litigation   |   Environmental, Land Use & Development Approvals and Litigation   |   Real Estate   |   August 15, 2018
Download Download   
Share Share Page

Attorneys help oil company navigate complex permitting process, then win third-party lawsuit

Our client, an out-of-state oil company, wanted to conduct a seismic survey of oil and gas deposits within a 110-mile-square section of Florida’s Big Cypress National Preserve. The Big Cypress National Preserve is a unit of the National Park system, where most of the oil and gas interests are privately owned. To conduct the survey, our client needed National Park Service (NPS) approval.
We represented the oil company in the contentious permitting process, which lasted more than two years. Outside third-parties, including the Natural Resources Defense Council, opposed granting our client a permit. Ultimately, the NPS approved the survey, finding that it was unlikely to cause any significant or lasting environmental impacts.
Several environmental organizations then filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida. In that lawsuit, which challenged the legality of the NPS’s approval, we represented the oil company as intervening defendant. In a lengthy opinion, the U.S. District Court ruled for the defendants on all issues. The court found that, in granting its approval, the NPS complied with all applicable laws —its own regulations, the National Environmental Policy Act, and the Endangered Species Act. It also rejected the opponents’ arguments that the survey would cause significant harm.
This was a significant victory given the prevalence of adverse media coverage that sought to reduce the complicated legal issues involved to soundbites. The matter demonstrated our ability to represent companies in complex and challenging environmental permitting processes, and then successfully defend the permit approvals against third-party challenges.

©2023 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.


The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.