Menu

Carlton Fields Successfully Defends Transamerica in Putative Class Action Involving Long-Term Care Insurance

Class Actions   |   Insurance   |   Life, Annuity, and Retirement Litigation   |   Litigation and Trials   |   May 10, 2019
Download   
Share Page
In April 2019, a unanimous panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued its mandate affirming summary judgment in favor of Transamerica Life Insurance Company in a putative class action involving long-term care insurance. Attorneys from Carlton Fields’ National Class Actions practice group handled the case from inception through resolution of the appeal.

The plaintiff in the case, who sought to represent all insureds under long-term care insurance policies in the State of Washington, filed suit seeking nursing home benefits, despite residing in an assisted living facility that was not licensed as a nursing home, as required as the policy. The plaintiff argued that the company was required to pay nursing home benefits under a novel interpretation of various state laws and regulations that, according to the plaintiff, required the court to rewrite the policy to eliminate the licensing requirement.
 
Carlton Fields’ strategy included removing the case to federal court in Seattle under the Class Action Fairness Act and moving for an early summary judgment, before the end of discovery, based on well-established principles of contract interpretation. In a hotly contested battle of cross-motions for summary judgment and plaintiff’s motion for additional discovery, Chief Judge Ricardo S. Martinez of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington granted summary judgment to Transamerica and denied any further discovery. The court agreed with the contractual and legal arguments crafted by the Carlton Fields team, holding that the plaintiff was not entitled to represent a class because he did not, himself, have a viable theory of liability.
 
The plaintiff appealed, with the support of a consumer advocacy group as amicus curiae, and the Ninth Circuit panel affirmed the district court in all respects and adopted all of the arguments advanced by the Carlton Fields team.
 
The judgment was an appropriate and significant win for the industry. A negative result could have required a change in contract interpretation by insurers with similar long-term care insurance policies, would have likely driven up the cost of premiums for all policyholders, and threatened similar litigation for the industry as a whole.
 
Carlton Fields’ attorneys Markham Leventhal, Julianna McCabe, Jason Kairalla, and Andy Chagui handled the case for Transamerica, and Julianna McCabe argued the appeal to the Ninth Circuit.
 


©2019 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.