Adviser Disaster Plans Don’t Hold Water
In the wake of Hurricane Sandy, an SEC National Exam Program Risk Alert has identified gaps in some investment advisers’ disaster recovery and business continuity procedures (BCPs), including:
- inadequate anticipation of truly widespread disasters in which, for example, key personnel are not even able to work from their homes and other planned remote locations, or back-up facilities are not safely located;
- failure by advisers to critically evaluate the BCPs of their IT and other service providers (including SSAE 16 reports);
- failure to arrange for maintenance that will assure that back-up computer servers will function properly;
- insufficient testing of the adviser’s BCPs, including overly narrow test scenario assumptions or failure to apply the assumptions to all critical business operations and systems. In particular, the Risk Alert criticizes advisers who failed to test a critical system because the system’s vendor imposed a charge or other disincentive to testing; and
- inadequate arrangements for communicating with employees and clients in the event of a crisis.
The Risk Alert, which is based on a National Exam Program review of the BCPs of 40 investment advisers, was motivated by Hurricane Sandy and contains numerous other observations and specific suggestions. According to the Exam Program staff, "Advisers should review their continuity plans in light of the staff’s observations and consider revising their plans if they see ways to make them better."
The points covered in the Risk Alert provide advisers a useful checklist for doing just that, and SEC examiners can be expected to refer to the alert, as well.
©2019 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.