Menu

An Unlikely Condition Precedent to Foreclosure in Florida

Consumer Finance   |   Real Estate   |   December 22, 2014
Download   
Share Page

Mortgage servicers beware. Mortgagors in Florida are defending residential mortgage foreclosures based on the allegation that the servicer failed to give them notice of assignment of the right to bill and collect on the debt underlying the mortgage before commencing the foreclosure action.

The argument is based on Florida Statute Section 559.715, the Florida Consumer Collection Practices Act (FCCPA), and seizes on an October 1, 2010 amendment that requires the notice be given “as soon as practical after the assignment is made, but at least 30 days before any action to collect the debt.”

The argument is misguided, however, as Florida law holds that an in rem mortgage foreclosure is an action to enforce a security instrument and not to collect a debt. Numerous cases from the Eleventh Circuit, including Trent v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and Warren v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. distinguish the collection of funds due on a debt and the foreclosure of a security interest in real property, holding the latter is not debt collection activity under the FCCPA or its federal counterpart, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA).

In Freire v. Aldridge Connors, LLP, a Florida district court held that a mortgage foreclosure action will constitute debt collection activity only when the complaint also seeks to collect on the note, that is, independently demands payment on the underlying debt. Most recently, in Reese v. Ellis, Painter, Ratterree & Adams, LLP, the Eleventh Circuit reiterated the difference between a promissory note (which evidences a debt and specifies terms under which one party will pay money to another) and a security interest (not a promise to pay a debt, but an interest in collateral that a lender can take if a debtor does not fulfill a payment obligation). Thus, the FCCPA does not apply to strictly in rem mortgage foreclosure actions, and nothing in Section 559.715 indicates that the notice required is a condition precedent to foreclosing on a security interest.

As a practical matter, welcome letters are typically sent to mortgagors when their servicer changes and such letters will satisfy the alleged condition and avoid the argument. Where a welcome letter has not been sent or is unavailable, the best offense to a Section 559.715 defense is not to demand payment of the underlying debt in the mortgage foreclosure complaint.


©2019 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Subscribe to Publications

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.