Menu

FINRA: “Fiduciary” Standard Architect?

Securities and Derivative Litigation   |   March 31, 2014
Download Download   
Share Share Page

FINRA is encouraging broker-dealers (BDs) to act in their customers’ best interests, although the "suitability" standard applicable to BDs does not expressly require it.

For example, in 2012, FINRA implemented an expanded suitability rule and released Regulatory Notice 12-25, elaborating on its position that BDs should be "acting in [customers’] best interests." Similarly, FINRA’s Report on Conflicts of Interest last October urged BDs to implement strong conflict management frameworks, including a code of conduct based on the "best interests" standard.

These and other efforts to emphasize and define BDs’ conduct necessarily promote fiduciary-like duties of care and loyalty.

FINRA appeared to reinforce this notion when, last December, it announced the creation of an 11-member Investor Issues Committee (IIC) comprised of persons not currently associated with FINRA. Indeed, the IIC, which will advise FINRA on rulemaking and policy initiatives that impact investors, includes former SEC Chairman Elisse Walter. Ms. Walter has historically advocated a "harmonization" of the duties of BDs and investment advisers (IAs) such that BDs would have a more explicit fiduciary duty to their customers. The IIC also includes two members of the SEC’s Investor Advisory Committee, which, too, promotes investor interests and has advocated a fiduciary standard for BDs that would explicitly require them to act in their customers’ best interests.

It is unclear how closely the fiduciary-like standard that FINRA seems to be crafting for BDs will resemble the fiduciary standard already applicable to IAs. In any event, FINRA’s efforts may have some influence on the SEC’s ongoing deliberations about harmonizing such standards. FINRA may also be bolstering its credentials to advance its continuing ambition to be a self-regulatory organization for IAs.


©2022 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Subscribe to Publications

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.