Menu

Expect Focus Life Insurance, December 2017

Based on Principles of Fairness, Court Dismisses Putative Class Action RICO Claims Asserted Years After Initiation of Suit

Life, Annuity, and Retirement Litigation   |   Life, Annuity, and Retirement Solutions   |   December 29, 2017
Download   
Share Page

In Robertson v. SunLife Financial, a federal district court in Louisiana dismissed with prejudice as time-barred an amended putative class action complaint alleging RICO and state racketeering claims related to alleged wrongful conduct by an agent related to annuities issued by SunLife. The initial complaint was filed in 2008 as an individual action against the agent for allegedly forging a $999,999 check to fraudulently withdraw funds from the plaintiff’s annuity account. While the insurer had already been added as a defendant by then, earlier this year, nearly nine years after the action was initially brought, the complaint was amended to include putative class action RICO and state racketeering claims against Sun Life, based on alleged acts of racketeering purportedly occurring in 2005 through 2007.

After its removal of the action to federal court, SunLife moved to dismiss the RICO and state racketeering claims — subject to four-year and five-year limitations periods, respectively — as untimely. It was undisputed that the claims would fail as time-barred unless they could relate back to the date of the originally filed complaint. The plaintiff, though, failed to make this showing. As the court explained, pointing to both Fifth Circuit and Louisiana Supreme Court authorities, based on principles of fairness, relation back is permitted only if the original complaint gives the defendant fair notice of the claims brought in the amended complaint. However, it found that the plaintiff’s original complaint "did not allege, or even suggest, that Sun Life engaged in racketeering activities," where, as contrasted with the original complaint, the newly amended complaint alleged "criminal rather than negligent conduct," and introduced a "new key actor," among other "fundamental changes in plaintiff’s factual allegations." Consequently, Plaintiff’s racketeering claims were barred by the statute of limitations and dismissed by the district court with prejudice.


©2019 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Subscribe to Publications

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.