Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of April 30 - May 4, 2018
April 30, 2018

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Truesdell v. Thomas – DPPA, class cert, punitive damages


Florida Supreme Court – Tallahassee

Fla Bar v. Parrish - attorney discipline 
Jimenez v. State - red light cameras 
Fla Bd Bar Examiners v. Ferguson - attorney readmission 
Taylor v. State - capital case, postconviction relief


First District Court of Appeal – Tallahassee

Morris v. Morris - temporary custody, pick-up order 
Fair Insurance v. OIR - insurance rates, hearing 
Schanck v. Gayhart - execution, out of state assets, stock 
Johnson v. Breitenstein - conclusory appellate arguments 
Moise v. Disney Pop Century - workers' compensation 
Pettway v. Jacksonville - mandamus; filing, rendition dates 
Graham v. Uphold - corporate custodianship 
Fla Workers' Comp v. Am Residuals - employer status 
Howard v. State - sentencing 
TK v. State - delinquency, battery 
Norton v. Am Led Tech - non-compete, trade secrets 
Livingston v. State - involuntary commitment 
Columbia Bank v. Joye - premature appeal 
LaSalle Bank v. Griffin - prohibition; subject matter jurisdiction 
De Juan v. State - sentencing 
Homestead Speedway v. Homestead - administrative review, finality 
Ellis v. State - police car, insignia 
Global Hookah v. DBPR - tax assessments 
Morris v. State - sentencing 
Turbeville v. DFS - insurance license 
Quillen v. Quillen - dissolution, consent judgment, contempt 
Preudhomme v. Preduhomme - timesharing 
Preyer v. Emerald Coast UA - premature appeal 
Willoughby v. Madison Correctional - workers' compensation 
Plummer v. State - sentencing 
YG v. DCF - parental rights, termination


Second District Court of Appeal – Lakeland

Golfrock v. Lee Cnty - zoning, takings 
Greene v. State - criminal costs 
US Bank v. Gonzalez - foreclosure, limitations 
Denino v. Abbate - § 57.105, e-mail service, certified conflict 
Fields v. Devereux Found - intentional torts, vicarious liability 
Reverdes v. State - sentencing 
Martin v. State - Stand Your Ground, certified question


Third District Court of Appeal – Miami

Sosataquechel v. State - postconviction relief 
Deutsche Bank v. Torres - foreclosure, limitations 
DV v. State - constructive possession, certified conflict 
Gilman v. State - sentencing 
Muchnick v. Goihman - employee liability, undertaker's doctrine 
State v. Gomez - mandate enforcement 
Leon v. Carollo - elections, residency requirement 
Kemp v. State - postconviction relief


Fourth District Court of Appeal – West Palm Beach

GSK Hollywood Dev Group v. Hollywood - Harris Act 
Coppinger v. State - probation 
Lamb v. State - video evidence 
Denton v. State - untimely production 
Fleury v. State - disorderly conduct 
Stengel v. State - expert evaluation; stale 
Brown v. State - postconviction relief 
Hart v. State - sentencing; juvenile; Eighth Amendment


Fifth District Court of Appeal – Daytona Beach

Burnett v. State - Terry stop 
Eustace v. State - scrivener's error 
Ruiz v. State - juvenile resentencing 
Grays v. State - postconviction relief; new evidence
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.