Menu

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of February 12 - 16, 2018

Appellate & Trial Support   |   February 12, 2018
Download Download   
Share Share Page

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Dasher v. RBC Bank - arbitration 
Stout v. Jefferson Cnty Bd of Edu - desegregation 
CRI-Leslie v. IRS - tax


Florida Supreme Court – Tallahassee

Franklin v. State - capital case, postconviction relief 
Branch v. State - capital case, postconviction relief


First District Court of Appeal – Tallahassee

No decisions this week


Second District Court of Appeal – Lakeland

State v. AJ - oral motions; prosecutorial discretion 
McCampbell v. FNMA - foreclosure; original writing requirement 
Citizens v. Anderson - attorney's fees, supporting findings, lack of transcript 
Millan v. Millan - alimony 
Soliman v. State - sentencing 
Knight v. GTE Fed Credit - foreclosure; evidence, letter log 
St Petersburg v. Wright - Sunshine law, shade meeting 
C&J Global v. Capgain Props - intervention, reformation claim 
DT v. JM - child support 
Sukraj v. Phoeung - additur, past pain and suffering 
Bruce v. US Bank - appellate standing 
Wells v. Wells - marital dissolution, settlement agreement 
Youssef v. Zaitouni - personal jurisdiction 
Clayton v. State - personal property return 
Casiano v. Scott - Nebia pre-trial detainers 
Payas v. Adventist Health - health care, vicarious liability, nondelegable duty


Third District Court of Appeal – Miami

Ruiz v. State - post-trial release 
Westberry v. State - jury waiver 
Mt Vernon Fire Ins v. New Moon Mgmt - rule 1.442, settlement proposal 
Feller v. RJ Reynolds - rule 1.260, death, party substitution 
Wromas v. State - sentencing


Fourth District Court of Appeal – West Palm Beach

RJ Reynolds v. Schoeff - remand 
Pacchiana v. State - juror strike; religion 
Philip Morris v. Gore - preservation; punitive damages 
State v. Schultz - sentencing 
Alvarez v. State - circumstantial evidence 
Stickney v. State - use of force instruction 
Sch Bd Palm Beach v. FDOE - charter school 
Woodward v. State - contempt 
Sanchez v. Cinque - Daubert; comparative negligence; fees 
Eisenpresser v. Koenig - probate; accounting 
Canidate v. State - fleeing 
Catalo v. Llano Financing - attorney's fees 
Kunz v. Sch Bd Palm Beach - class-size amendment 
Hudson v. Sunrise - forfeiture 
Yaro v. Israel - age discrimination 
Freeman v. Omega Condo - attorney's fees; transcript 
Le v. Tralongo - personal jurisdiction 
Water Bridge 5 Assoc v. Davis - attorney's fees, costs 
Tesoro POA v. Tesoro Commons - temporary injunction


Fifth District Court of Appeal – Daytona Beach

Niehaus v. Niehaus - fraud on court 
Newman v. Hirst - certiorari, privilege, Boecher discovery 
Bishop v. State - sentencing


©2020 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Subscribe to Publications

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.