Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of February 5 - 9, 2018

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Target Media v. Specialty Marketing - defamation, Rooker-Feldman doctrine 
Salinas v. Ramsey - post-judgment discovery, limitations 
ML Healthcare v. Publix - collateral sources, spoliation 
Godelia v. Zoll Services - products, negligent infliction of emotional distress 
Green v. Georgia - habeas corpus, ineffective assistance, exhaustion


Florida Supreme Court – Tallahassee

Hamilton v. State - capital case, postconviction relief 
Rodgers v. State - capital case, postconviction relief; Hurst 
In re Std Jury Instr (Crim) - amended instructions 
In re Std Jury Instr (Crim) - additional amendments


First District Court of Appeal – Tallahassee

Stewart v. Stewart - equitable distribution 
Ash v. Campion - dissolution, contempt 
Murry v. State - missing transcript 
Berry v. State - competency 
Walker v. State - competency 
Thompson v. State - pro se sanctions 
US Bank v. Tranumn - attorney's fees, following merits reversal 
In re 73 Engle Cases - dismissal with prejudice 
Staines v. RJ Reynolds - Engle progeny, dismissal with prejudice 
Copeland v. State - sentencing 
Nassirou v. Borba - marital dissolution 
Crapo v. Provident Grp - taxes, real property 
Burnett v. Burnett - dissolution, alimony, insurance, fees 
Nolley v. State - constructive possession; opinion on guilt 
Cheney v. State - Faretta inquiry 
Hunt v. Lightfoot - certiorari, discovery, surveillance video 
DMS v. Ferron - prohibition, wrongful denial of claims


Second District Court of Appeal – Lakeland

Soria v. Soria - equitable distribution, alimony 
Persaud v. Persaud - alimony, child support 
St Louis v. State - double jeopardy 
Grimes v. Lottes - real property, broker commission, misrepresentation 
GAL v. DCF - parental rights, termination 
DeJesus v. MJRK - homestead, lien


Third District Court of Appeal – Miami

Douglas v. State - postconviction relief 
HSBC Bank v. Buset - foreclosure, standing; expert testimony, legal issues 
Wright v. State - pro se sanctions 
Williams v. Nuno - service of process 
Worth v. Estate of Stern - certiorari, punitive damages 
Diaz v. US Bank - foreclosure, sale while rehearing pending 
Rodriguez v. State - prohibition, Stand Your Ground immunity 
Bardakjy v. Empire Inv - appellate jurisdiction, appealable order 
Gutierrez v. State - sentencing 
Lincoln Enter v. Bookstein - appellate jurisdiction, stay, eviction


Fourth District Court of Appeal – West Palm Beach

Oakley v. State - sentencing 
Platt v. State - sentencing; offer of counsel 
Sabido v. Bank of NY Mellon - appellate attorney's fees 
Diaz v. Vasquez - marital dissolution; venue 
Pierre v. State - ineffective assistance; appellate counsel


Fifth District Court of Appeal – Daytona Beach

Nabbie v. Orlando Outlet - guaranty 
Progressive v. Fla Hosp - PIP, deductible, certified question 
Prewitt v. Kimmons - trust, fiduciary duties 
Browne v. State - robbery with weapon 
Hall v. Southcreek Homeowners - homeowners association, assessments 
Lapinski v. Green Tree - foreclosure, deficiency waived 
Keller v. Ramseyer - injunction for protection 
Restoration v. ASI - assignment of benefits
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.