Menu

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Weeks of November 19 - 30, 2018

Appellate & Trial Support   |   November 30, 2018
Download   
Share Page

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Cote v. Philip Morris - Engle, JMOL, due process
United States v. Oliva - speedy trial
Jordan v. MS DOC - Rule 30(b)(6), Lethal Injection Secrecy Act
Fernandez v. Bailey - Hague Convention on Child Abduction
Lopez v. United States - immigration
CSX v. United States - Railroad Ret Tax Act, Federal Insurance Contributions Act

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Tisdale v. State - capital case, direct appeal
Campbell v. State - capital case, post-conviction relief
Vickers v. Thomas - jurisdiction discharged
Trotti v. Scott - trial judge appointments
Fla. Bar v. Alters - attorney discipline
In re Std Jury Instr (Crim) - amended instructions
In re Std Jury Instr (Crim) - more amended instructions

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Kitt v. State - independent act doctrine
Bennett v. State - conspiracy, principals instruction
Jenkins v. State - trial court standards, acquittal, new trial
Madison v. State - opening the door
3 Josephs v. Lease Inv. - foreclosure sale
Shands v. DOH - unadopted rules, admin challenge
Nieves v. State - sentencing
Ham v. Portfolio Recovery - account stated, fees; certified conflict
Channell v. State - search and seizure
Williams v. State - sentencing
Boston v. State - Stand Your Ground
Scott v. Hinkle - prohibition, financial disclosures, Ethics Comm’n
Napoli v. Div of Risk Mgmt. - parol evidence
DOH v. Rehab Ctr. - contempt, public records request
Marraffino v. Stericycle - workers’ compensation
Carter v. State - habeas corpus
Holmes v. FAMU - employment, breach of contract
Keystone Airpark v. Pipeline - special damages; certified question
Daly v. DJJ - juvenile detention funding
Burnsed v. FCOR - certiorari, release 
Calhoun v. State - preservation of error, jury instructions; sentencing
Wells Fargo v. Smith - rule 1.540, void order, jurisdiction
Huckaba v. State - information; ineffective assistance
Cooper v. State - Richardson inquiry; plea discussion evidence
Floyd v. State - driver’s license, learner’s permit

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Negron v. State - probation revocation
Martin v. State - post-conviction relief
RM v. State - juveniles, right to counsel
Adkins v. Mem Motors - arbitration

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Heredia v. State - preservation of error
Medina v. State - battered spouse syndrome, expert testimony, Daubert
Nestor v. Estate of Posner - settlement approval
Brown v. State - Alleyne violation
Deutsche Bank v. Sombrero Bch Rd - foreclosure, dismissal, Kozel
DCF v. Feliciano - appellate jurisdiction, sovereign immunity
Colgan v. Shadow Point - riparian rights, property ownership
Five Seas v. Guzman - condominium, easement
Demir v. Schollmeier - personal jurisdiction, service, fundamental error
Deer Valley Realty v. Beck & Lee - dismissal as sanction
Hales v. State - post-conviction relief, venue
Coventry Health v. Crosswinds Rehab - arbitration
Kelly v. Torres - prohibition
Citizens v. Ballester - disregard of court order
D&E v. Vitto - specific performance
Wilson v. State - right to counsel
Citizens v. Vazquez - discovery violations, insurance claims
Starboard Cruise v. DePrince - rule 1.442, settlement proposal
Fla. Recov Adjust v. Pretium Homes - garnishment, civil theft, treble damages
Towns v. State - probation revocation
Hayes v. Reverse Mortgage - foreclosure, reverse mortgage, limitations
Falcon v. Wilmington Sav - foreclosure, default
White v. Ferco Motors - FDUTPA, auto purchase
Harborside Suites v. Rosen - garnishment
MP v. State - delinquency, evidence, uncharged crime
Highland Stucco v. Onorato - personal jurisdiction
Olaechea v. Olaechea - equitable lien

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Pansky v. Pansky - s. 57.105; attorneys' fees; evidence
Cataldo v. State - sentencing
Cook v. Cook - guardianship; physical examination
Powers v. State - sentencing
Seligsohn v. Seligsohn - guardian ad litem; fees; marital dissolution
Cammarata v. Cammarata - child support
Charterhouse v. Valencia Reserve - property association; invitee
Brown & Brown v. Gelsomino - joint and several liability; abolishment; retroactivity
State v. Meyers - DUI; blood test; consent
Puhl v. Puhl - marital dissolution; parenting plan
Benavente v. Ocean Village - foreclosure; substitute service
Chalmers v. Chalmers - marital dissolution; child relocation
KC v. DCF - parental rights
Reidy v. Reidy - prohibition; charging lien; timeliness
State v. Wooten - search warrants; redaction; confidentiality
Ferrari v. State - cell-site location information, Fourth Amendment; Richardson
Telisme v. State - ineffective assistance
Little Club Condo v. Martin County - cell tower, comprehensive plan
Countyline Auto Ctr v. Kulinsky - arbitration
Sn Specialties v. Farmhouse Tomatoes - offer of judgment
Saponara v. Saponara - relocation
In re Name Change - name change
Vale v. Palm Beach County - Bert Harris Act
Maldonado v. Buchsbaum - temporary injunction

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Linville v. State – post-conviction relief
DCF v. BY – dependency, arraignment; dismissal
Araj v. Renfro – jury instruction; scooter, highway
Mitchell v. State – postconviction relief
Portwood v. Portwood – alimony, contempt, enforcement
EO Ramsey v. Northport Health Servs. of Fla. – arbitration, Alabama Rules of Evidence
Foley v. State – scrivener’s error
Greenshields v. Greenshields – sale proceeds, restriction; injunction, dissolve
Wilson v. DCF – food assistance, overpayment; hearing
State v. Frank – certiorari, pretrial intervention
Tedder v. State – pro se filing restrictions
Brumfield v. State – post-conviction relief
Hodges v. State – post-conviction relief
Stokes v. State – pro se, frivolous appellate filings
Turem v. State – postconviction relief
Baker v. State – remand, juvenile sentencing
Berger v. State – en banc; attempted sexual battery, minor
Griffin v. Putnam County Sheriff - Whistleblower Act
Kohl v. Rammacca – dissolution, setoff
Clark v. State – scrivener’s error
In re Adoption of JMB – stepparent adoption, consent
Minix v. State – postconviction relief
Jones v. State – community control
Smail v. State – sentence
PR v. DCF – parental rights, termination
Duncan v. State – Rule 1.540(b), opportunity to amend


©2019 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Subscribe to Publications

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.