Menu

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of October 1 - 5, 2018

Appellate & Trial Support   |   October 5, 2018
Download   
Share Page

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Estate of Cummings v. Davenport - qualified immunity, interlocutory appeal
In re Teltronics - bankruptcy
Yarbrough v. Decatur Housing Auth - § 1983, HCDA
Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier - FACTA, class settlement
Ovalles v. US - firearms, vagueness, en banc

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Allen v. Nunez - proposals for settlement, rule 1.442
Jennings v. State - capital case, postconviction relief
Villasol CDD v. TC 12 - dismissed, improvidently granted
Fla Bar Adv Op - unlicensed practice of law
Miller v. State - sentencing
In re Fla R Crim Pro - amended rules
Anderson v. State - capital case, postconviction relief
Zack v. State - capital case, postconviction relief
In re Fla Std Jury Instr (Crim) - amended instructions
Jimenez v. State - capital case, postconviction relief

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Howard v. State - severance
State v. Green - trial court jurisdiction, deceased defendant
Williams v. State - certiorari, competency
DHSMV v. Kamau - mandate enforcement
Oats v. State - competency
Mardosas v. State - search and seizure
LaLa v. FCOR - certiorari, right to file reply
Elmer v. State - pro se sanctions
Rivers v. Brite Houses - appellate jurisdiction
Christy v. State - prohibition, speedy trial

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

FL - 7 v. SWF - real estate commission, unpled theory
State Farm v. Lyde - uninsured motorist coverage
Hunt v. State - drug trafficking

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Atlantic Civil v. Swift - proposal for settlement
Parks v. State - sentencing
McGlocklin v. State - pro se sanctions
UT v. State - indirect contempt, home detention
FNMA v. JKM Serv - intervention, receivership, condominiums
WT v. State - officer, execution of legal duty
Robinson v. Safepoint Ins - fraud on the court
KN v. State - competency, juvenile
Billot Pigna v. Messianu - probate, appealable order
Ocean Bank v. Gato - foreclosure sale, delay
WD 19790 v. Trust - premature appeal
MK v. DCF - certiorari; shelter order

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Pogue v. Garib - additur; permanent injury
Green v. State - sentencing; mental health
Darden v. Ostanne - arbitration; employment

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Nix v. FNMA - foreclosure, paragraph 22
Lazzaro v. State - closing argument, bolstering
Ruffenach v. Ocwen Loan - mandamus, order striking jury demand


©2019 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Subscribe to Publications

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.