Menu

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of April 15 - 19, 2019

Appellate & Trial Support   |   April 19, 2019
Download   
Share Page

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Hall v. Fla DOC - AEDPA
US v. Johnson - search & seizure
US v. Corbett - sentencing
US v. Gordillo - sentencing
A&M Gerber Chiropractic v. GEICO - standing, class certification, insurance

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Glass v. Nationstar - mandate recalled, jurisdiction discharged
Halifax Hosp v. State - bond validation, hospital construction
Orange Cnty v. Singh - mandate recalled, county elections, home rule
In re Judge Kollra - judicial discipline
Jackson v. DeSantis - quo warranto, county officer suspension

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Casey v. State - pro se sanctions
Rogers v. State - sentencing
Kruse v. State - license suspension, psychotherapist
Casasanta v. Sailshare - opinion requested, exculpatory clause, dangerous condition
Russell v. State - impeachment evidence, opening door
In re Estate of Bunda - certiorari, vacating probate order
Bradley v. State - sentencing
Reinard v. State - aggravated child abuse

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Whitham v. State - Stand Your Ground, certified conflict
Pelphrey-Weigand v. Weigand - marital dissolution, fees, res judicata
Marco Marine v. Kopras - settlement proposal, maritime law, en banc
Dagan v. State - sentencing, memo of sentence, snapout

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

JA v. Housel - habeas corpus
McGlocklin v. State - pro se sanctions
Leon v. Supreme Constr - failure to prosecute
Alvarez v. State Farm - insured, material misrepresentation
Benitez v. Benitez - judicial disqualification
Adv Sys v. Gotham Ins - insurance, duty to defend
Safepoint Ins v. Sousa - appraisal
Rodriguez v. Stanfield - summary affirmance
Miami-Dade MRI v. United Auto - second-tier certiorari, insurance, fees
Evans v. State - habeas corpus, ineffective assistance

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Lacue v. State - sentencing
Stubbs v. State - similar fact evidence
Rutledge v. State - collateral estoppel, double jeopardy
Johnson v. State - confession, voluntariness
American Airlines v. Cimino - certiorari, privilege
Maguire-Ress v. Stettner - summary judgment
Brown v. State - forfeiture of gain time
Levy v. Levy - non-dissolution alimony

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Restal v. Nocera - rear-end collision, summary judgment, comparative fault
Slinger v. State - sentencing
CalAtlantic v. Dau - contract language re fees
Jenkins v. State - untimely appeal
State v. Griffin - incest, dismissal
State v. Wilson - probable cause, traffic stop
Freeman v. State - involuntary commitment
Mitchell v. State - habeas corpus


©2019 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Subscribe to Publications

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.