Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of August 12 - 16, 2019
August 16, 2019

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

US v. Brown - excessive force, sentencing
Carvelli v. Ocwen Fin Corp - securities fraud
Lewis v. Union City - ADA

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Bowles v. State - capital case, postconviction relief

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Smiley v. State - wiretap law, privacy
Wright v. State  - recalcitrant witness, striking testimony
Ansley v. State - collateral crime evidence
Caudle v. State - postconviction relief
Hudson v. State - aiding and abetting murder, evidence
Mackey v. State - second degree murder, evidence
Yacob v. State - postconviction relief
Graham v. State - sentencing, equal protection
Ford Motor CC v. Arwine - debt collection, collateral, disposition
Freeman v. Crochet - lack of transcript
Hotchkiss v. BCBS - FDUTPA
Davis v. State - competency; sentencing
Marshall v. State - postconviction relief
Hollonbeck v. Hollonbeck - § 61.16, fees; timesharing
Harrell v. Ryland Grp - statute of repose, attic ladder
Abruscato v. State - written opinion request, sentencing
Savell v. State - prohibition, best evidence rule

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Barrientos v. State - Miranda
State v. Monroe - Miranda
Pirate’s Treasure v. Dunedin - zoning, declaratory action, torts, standing
Barnett v. State - double jeopardy
Morejon-Medina v. State - ineffective assistance, double jeopardy
Perez v. State - postconviction relief
Rogers v. State - second-tier certiorari, circuit court appeal dismissal

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Fla Retail Fed v. Coral Gables - styrofoam, home rule, preemption
Lopez-Macaya v. State - domestic battery, evidence, preservation of error
Miccosukee Tribe v. Lewis Tein - settlement proposal, good faith
Ryland v. State - postconviction relief
Orban v. Rorrer - civil contempt
Lamoise Grp v. Edgewater S Beach CA - rule 1.540, voidness
Raven v. Roosevelt REO - foreclosure, summary judgment, defenses
Smith v. State - postconviction relief
Pino v. CGH Hosp - fraud on court, sanction
Rosa v. State - sentencing
Hanna v. State - postconviction relief

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Logue v. Book - injunction, stalking
In re Kirby - attorney's fees, notice
Lucas v. Hutchinson - vicarious liability, vehicle
Wallace Buick v. Rite Way Auto - personal jurisdiction
Lifetime Guarantee Admin v. Kaminskey - lack of prosecution, notice
Wilson v. Wilson - prenuptial agreement, elective share
Robinson v. State - postconviction relief
Wiley v. State - sentencing, sanctions
Cruz v. State - jail visitor log, public record
Hernandez v. State - calendar call, waiver of appearance

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Marini v. Kellett - paternity, time-sharing
Hubbard v. Berth - dissolution, pension, marital portion
Spence v. State - postconviction relief
Wishinsky v. Choufani - dismissal, constructive fraud, fiduciary duties
Williams v. State - postconviction relief
McKeehan v. State - Spencer warning, pro se
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.