Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of August 19 - 23, 2019
August 23, 2019

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

US v. Stahlman - opinion testimony, sentencing
Bowles v. DeSantis - stay of execution, § 1983
US v. Hawkins - opinion testimony
Diverse Power v. LaGrange City - state-action immunity
Pesci v. Budz - § 1983, First Amendment
Bowles v. Fla DOC - stay of execution, habeas corpus
Perez-Sanchez v. US - immigration
Huebner v. Bradshaw - search and seizure, excessive force
In re Bowles - successive habeas petition, stay of execution
Bellitto v. Snipes - NVRA, HAVA

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

No decisions this week.

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Hicks v. State - en banc denial, appeal after plea
Marshall v. State - sentencing
Kever v. State - competency
Holmes v. State - second-degree murder, evidence
Roberts v. State - peremptory, scope of cross, lay opinion, past recollection recorded
Moore v. State - jury poll
Bell v. Jacksonville - limitations, relation back
Nolan v. State - detective's identification from video, new trial standard
DOH v. Redner - costs reversal following merits
Lewis v. OPD - mandamus, evidentiary hearing
Brown v. State - Williams rule evidence, challenging counsel's credibility
Schiano v. Hollywood PD - workers' compensation
Neurology Partners PA v. Progressive - second-tier certiorari, scope
Taulbee v. State - sentencing

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Shrader v. State - en banc review, use of; judgment of acquittal standard

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Moxey v. State - probation revocation
Miami v. Santos - injunction, administrative hearing
Proj Dev Ent v. Elka Hldgs - derivative claim, damages
Varela v. Ola CA - non-party discovery, attorney-client privilege
Diogo v. Diogo - Applegate affirmance
Mesa v. Miami-Dade - lack of prosecution, rule 1.540 challenge
McGee v. State - postconviction relief
CDC Cap Inv v. Specialized - Applegate affirmance
Reno v. Hurchalla - probate, trust
DiRusso v. CIT Bank - foreclosure sale
Cazarez v. State - postconviction relief
Aparicio v. Deutsche Bank - foreclosure sale
Real State Golden Inv v. Larrain - prohibition, judicial disqualification

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Natal v. State - reckless driving
Brown v. State - sentencing
Hudson v. State - collateral crime; self-defense
Maldonado v. State - search and seizure; GPS monitor
Homeowners Choice v. Mahady - certiorari; discovery; claims files
First Protective Ins v. Ahern - insurance; appraisal; waiver
North Broward Hospital v. Slusher - certiorari; medical negligence; dismissal

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Harris v. State - entrapment
State v. Washington - sentencing, downward departure
Swearingen v. Rio Villa - subject matter jurisdiction
#1 Anytime Bail v. State - remission, bond
Copeland v. State - ineffective assistance
Patel v. Patel - partition, evidentiary hearing
Guan v. Ellingsworth Res. Comm. Assn. - arbitration
Williams v. State - sentencing framework
Sharma v. State - plea, gain time, time to be served
Ford v. State - sentencing
George v. State - postconviction relief
Stewart v. State - sanctions, pro se filings
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.