Menu

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of August 5 - 9, 2019

Appellate & Trial Support   |   August 9, 2019
Download   
Share Page

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Yarbrough v. Decatur Housing Auth - § 1983, Housing Act
Ali v. US - immigration
Luxottica Group v. Airport Mini Mall - Lanham Act
Dear v. Q Club Hotel - condo declaration

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

No decisions this week.

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Burnsed v. FCOR - internet access, conditional release, Packingham
Livingston v. State - ineffective assistance, uncalled witness, certified question
Conner v. Moran - small claims court; mandamus, trial setting
DOC v. Miami Herald - prison video recordings, media access
Maxwell v. Inch - habeas corpus
Cannie v. State - jurisdiction pending 3.800 appeal
Baity v. State - excited utterance
DePinto v. Hoffman - vexatious litigant
JJ v. DACS - license revocation
Pembelton v. State - postconviction relief
Ferrera-Discua v. State - prohibition, Stand Your Ground

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Allen v. Juul - marital dissolution, fees, findings, certified conflict
Summers v. State - fines, identifying authority
Beck v. Howard - parental custody
DiStefano v. Long - dating violence injunction
Abdo v. Abdo - constructive trusts, jurisdiction; shareholder derivative claim

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Safepoint Ins v. Brown - rule 1.442, settlement proposal
Chavez v. Tower Hill - res judicata, insurance claim
George v. DOC - restitution lien
Trust RE Ventures v. Desnick - summary judgment, discovery pending
Young Land v. Credo - real property, quiet title, extinguishment
Greene v. Johnson - arbitration
McCray v. State - postconviction relief
Rinconcito Latino Cafe v. Ocampos - rule 1.540, evidentiary hearing
State Farm v. Caribbean Rehab - second-tier certiorari, circuit court appellate fees
Baptiste v. State - postconviction relief
Gallo v. State Farm - second-tier certiorari, PIP benefits, unlawfulness defense

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Puzio v. State - sentencing
Garcia v. State - sentencing
Price v. State - search and seizure; sentencing
Universal Property & Casualty Ins v. Loftus - Condominium Act; negligence; tenants
People's Trust Ins v. Nowroozpour - counterclaim; injunction; dismissal
Progressive Express Ins v. Belidor - venue
State v. Kigar - general intent crime; advice of counsel defense

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Ray v. State - postconviction relief
Rios v. State - Miranda
R & W Rental Props v. Warnick - mistrial, isolated comment
Cruz v. Community Bank - breach of trust, standing
Monts v. State - cross-examination, scope


©2019 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Subscribe to Publications

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.