Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of January 21 - 25, 2019
January 26, 2019

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Brewster v. Hetzel - habeas corpus
Flores-Panameno v. US - immigration
Perez-Zenteno v. US - immigration
Echols v. Lawton - § 1983, qualified immunity

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

No decisions this week.

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Pierce v. Pierce - child support, findings
DOH v. TropiFlora - prohibition, exhausting admin remedies
McCray v. State - attempted felony murder, competency, costs
Gilliams v. State - cross-examination, murder, medical malpractice
Bussie v. State - probation revocation
Dailey v. Roth - repeat violence injunction
Joyner v. Worley - missing transcript, marital dissolution
AHCA v. Smathers - wholly favorable order, appellate jurisdiction
Johnson v. State - ineffective assistance, appellate counsel
Fales v. State - new trial standard, reconsideration
Northwood Assoc v. Ertel - contracts clause, single subject challenge

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

King v. State - competency, jury instruction on insanity
Eastwood Shores v. DEO - MRTA, association, reviving covenants
Rector v. Rector - marital settlement agreement, enforcement
Harper v. GEICO - duplicate final judgment
Goudreau v. State - probation revocation
Sutton v. State - competency, relinquishment
Harris v. Gattie - certiorari, trial court pro se sanctions
State v. Lawrence - postconviction relief

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

JA v. Housel - habeas corpus
WD 19790 v. Dan Trust - temporary injunction, trespass
Lee v. Lee - probate, order striking disclaimer
Musi v. Credo - unpled damages claims, real property, loss of use
People's Trust Ins v. Garcia - insurance appraisal
Smith v. State - reasonable doubt instruction
Charry v. Torres - intervention
Dalkeith v. State - trespass in conveyance, sentencing
CY v. State - assault, sentencing
Villella v. Ansin - certiorari, discovery temporary denial
Johnson v. State - pro se sanctions

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Cammalleri v. State - civil lien; rehearing
Ramos v. State - recanting witness
Henry v. State - grand theft; contact information
Arch Ins v. Kubicki Draper - standing, privity exceptions
Deutsche Bank v. Harris - standing; condition precedent
Nelms v. State - sentencing
State v. Fonseca - DUI, identification
Shade v. State - double jeopardy
Mercantil Bank v. Pazmino - foreclosure, money judgment

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Recco v. State - molestation; cross-examination of victim, prior inconsistent statements
Floyd v. Bank of America - foreclosure, attorney's fees, standing
Walker v. State - withdraw plea, good cause
Middleton v. Asher - summary judgment; trip and fall, open and obvious
Padilla v. State - probation revocation, written order
Davis v. Karr - med mal, presuit requirements
Mitchell v. State - corrected opinion; probation revocation, written order
Archie v. State - sex offender probation, violation
Byers v. Bank of NY - foreclosure, constructive service; appellate jurisdiction
Riggenbach v. Rhodes - certiorari; med mal, presuit requirements
Crum v. State - habeas corpus, Spencer warning
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.