Menu

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of March 11 - 15, 2019

Appellate & Trial Support   |   March 15, 2019
Download   
Share Page

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Sebastian v. Ortiz - qualified immunity

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

No decisions this week

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Kitchen v. State - postconviction relief
Ford v. State - murder, evidence
Ogden v. State - postconviction relief
Public Counsel v. PSC - water, wastewater utility rates
Payne v. Allstaff - workers' compensation
Snyder v. Fla Prepaid - tuition contract, summary judgment
Robinson v. State - sentencing

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Lyday v. Myakka Valley - deed restriction, MRTA
Dyck-O'Neal v. Norton - deficiency, limitations; estoppel
Samad v. Pla - surviving spouse, homestead election, timing
Edwards v. State - double jeopardy
Tillman v. State - Stand Your Ground, retroactivity, certified conflict
Grdic v. HSBC - foreclosure, judgment for unpaid debt
Zich v. Bautista-Diaz - certiorari, discovery
TL v. FM - Marchman act, due process

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Edward v. State - sentencing
Baker v. State - double jeopardy
Gonzalez v. Citizens - coverage, summary judgment standard
State v. Mackey - appellate jurisdiction, information dismissal
Ancla Int'l v. Tribeca Asset Mgmt - premature appeal
LB Judgment v. Boschetti - lis pendens, damages, bond
Sanders v. State - pro se sanctions
Blue Star v. Citizens - coverage, summary judgment
Woodson Elec v. Port Royal Prop - venue
Duggans v. State - appellate jurisdiction

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Dippolito v. State - opening the door; objective entrapment
Volvo Aero v. Vas Aero - tortious interference, business relationship
Moore v. State - sentencing
Corominas v. Ajay Dev - attorney's fees; inequitable conduct doctrine
Gooden v. State - closing argument; improper comments
DS v. State - juvenile; probation violation; sexual offender registration

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Law Office of Brehne v. Porter Law Firm - settlement proceeds, charging lien
Gilliland v. Gilliland - dissolution, permanent alimony, fees
Conti v. Auchter - car accident, PFS, loss of consortium
Kempton v. McComb - attorney's fees, merits reversal
AP Atlantic v. Silver Creek - non-signatory, arbitration
Frerking v. Stacy - dissolution, permanent alimony, imputed income
Knapp v. State - postconviction relief
Whittaker v. PNC Bank - foreclosure, personal jurisdiction, standing
Jones v. State - habeas corpus; ineffective assistance, appellate
Lundgren v. State - mandamus, appellate record
Waddell v. State - postconviction relief
Poirier v. Poirier - prohibition, disqualification


©2019 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Subscribe to Publications

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.