Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of March 18 - 22, 2019
March 23, 2019

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

MSPA Claims 1 v. Tenet Fla - Medicare
Ala DOC v. Advance Local Media - intervention, right of access
US v. St. Hubert - en banc
Orion Marine Const v. Carroll - admiralty
Ga Muslim Voter Proj v. Kemp - stay pending appeal
Lewis v. City of Union City - equal protection, comparators

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

No decisions this week

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Managed Care v. Fla Healthy Kids - public records, trade secrets
Meehan v. Orange Cnty Data - workers' compensation
Steel v. State - postconviction relief
MV Senior Mgmt v. Redus - premature appeal
Wannall v. Gadsden Cnty EMS - prisoner, zone of risk
Kanter Real Estate v. DEP - oil, gas permits, administrative review
Flanagan v. State - criminal fines, costs, payment plan
Day v. State - postconviction relief
FCCI v. Pulte Home - premature appeal, provisional fee award

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Bailey v. State - sentencing
Pearson v. Pearson - equitable distribution
Topalli v. Feliciano - conditional continuance, fees
JDP v. State - delinquency
Williams v. State - witness tampering
Trice v. Trice - domestic violence injunction
Deschamps v. Smith - contempt
Gomillion v. State - certiorari, discovery, toxicology

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Helfrich v. State - peremptory challenge
Clarke-Morales v. Coca-Cola - costs following dismissal
Kendall Healthcare v. Madrigal - adopting proposed order; interest
Howard v. State - petit theft
Ruiz v. State - voir dire
Rierson v. Deveau - closing argument
Philip Morris v. Gloger - diagnosis through lay witness
Dray v. Duffner Shendell - trust, rescission

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Arch Ins Co v. Kubicki Draper - standing, certified question
Brooks v. State - ID evidence, acquittal
Ayos v. State - preservation, costs
Cruz v. Wal-Mart - summary judgment, burden
Rizack v. Signature Bank - personal jurisdiction, discovery
Dedominicis v. State - age, evidence
Salomon v. State - jury instruction, fundamental error; bolstering
Urribari v. 52 SW 5th Ct - judgment on the pleadings, four corners
MTGLQ Investors v. Davis - condition precedent, foreclosure
KO v. State - false name, resisting arrest
NA v. DCF - placement, jurisdiction

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

HHA Borrower v. WG Yates - attorney's fees, prevailing party
Crawford v. Fannie Mae - foreclosure, subrogation, lien
Jones v. State - severed charge, collateral estoppel
State v. Phillips - certified question, Fourth Amendment
Carroll v. State - withdraw plea, appeal, jurisdiction
Ellis v. Allen - child support, noncovered medical expenses
Negron v. State - criminal, investigative costs
Kelly v. State - scrivener's error
Horvatt v. State - criminal, property seizure, timeliness
Torres v. State - community control, written order
Seaman v. Seaman - indirect civil contempt
Dhanraj v. Garcia - certified question, certiorari, attorney financial relationship
Keene v. State - postconviction relief
Horvatt v. State - Spencer bar, pro se
Span v. State - postconviction relief, Spencer warning
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.