Menu

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of May 20 - 24, 2019

Appellate & Trial Support   |   May 24, 2019
Download   
Share Page

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Playnation Play Sys v. Velex Corp - trademark
Smith v. Ala DOC - habeas corpus
Long v. Fla DOC - stay of execution, res judicata
US v. Askins & Miller Ortho - preliminary injunction
Word v. Comm Futures Trading Comm'n - CEA, jurisdiction
US v. Babcock - search & seizure
Club Madonna v. City of Miami Beach - ripeness

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

In re Evidence Code - Daubert returns

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Gaskey v. State - Miranda, right to counsel, confession
Vito v. State - plea withdrawal
Mallet v. State - postconviction relief
Halveland v. DOC - amending pleadings, relation back
Bordonaro v. Bordonaro - child support
Hicks v. DOC - mandamus, requirements

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Raff v. Citimortgage - attorney's fees, expert testimony
Wells Fargo v. Ordonez - tax on notes
Underwood v. State - trial court jurisdiction pending appeal
Lee Cnty Sch Bd v. State Farm - PIP benefits, sovereign immunity
Valencia Golf v. Comm'y Resource - prevailing party fees, dismissal, settlement
Matlacha v. Cape Coral - second-tier certiorari, standing, ordinance challenge
King v. King - equitable distribution

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Sea Vault v. Bermello, Ajamil - arbitration, sanctions
Pena v. Rodriguez - paternity
GEICO v. Perez - fees, costs, reversal following merits
Country Club v. Gracia - Applegate
Falsetto v. Liss - release, scope
Covenant Baptist v. Vasallo Constr - leaky roof, limitations
Alfonso v. Miami-Dade - mandamus, certiorari, trial court stay
Forte v. State - sentencing
Schwartz v. Banks - mandamus, certiorari, duty to rule

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Aragon v. State - lesser included instruction
State v. Hansen - false bomb threat
Venezia v. JP Morgan - foreclosure, attorney's fees
Taylor v. Price - petition for protection
RL v. DCF - termination of parental rights

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Amaro v. State - postconviction relief
SHP IV Island v. Boylan - compel arbitration, waiver
Beauchamp v. State - habeas corpus
White v. State - probation violation, written order


©2019 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Subscribe to Publications

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.