Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of May 27 - 31, 2019
May 31, 2019

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

S&M Brands v. Georgia – Contract Clause, Equal Protection, immunity
A&M Gerber Chiro v. GEICO – standing, class cert, insurance

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

IIn re Std Jury Instr (Crim) - amended instructions

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Magnanua v. State - certiorari, deposition
McBee v. State - postconviction relief
Ephron v. State - probation revocation
Escambia  v. Santa Rosa OA - tax, constitutionality, public official standing
MILA ALF v. AHCA - ALF license, denial, timing, grounds
Williams v. State - mandamus, rule 3.133(b)
Cooley v. State - Miranda, Williams rule evidence
Musselwhite v. Fla Farm Gen Ins - coverage, d/b/a designation, designated premises
Ford v. Fla Hosp - FCHR jurisdiction, hospitals

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Murphy v. State - sentencing
Walker v. Walker - marital dissolution
Weitz v. State - double jeopardy
Shaw v. Shaw - alimony
Herrera v. State - sentencing
East Bay v. Estate of Djadjich - certiorari, discovery, privileges
Lee v. State - prison diet
Newby v. State - reverse Williams rule evidence
Franklin v. State - lesser included offense instructions
Arias v. Porter - pain and suffering, inadequate verdict
Tharp v. State - sentencing
Horowitz v. Horowitz - imputed income, alimony
EV v. DMVH - parenting plan
Sticky Holsters v. Wagner - corporate ownership

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Alonso v. de Zarraga - indirect criminal contempt
S Shore Condo v. The 20 CA - premature appeal
Benefit Admin v. W Kendall Baptist - default judgment, excusable neglect
Rivera v. Rivera - marital home, partition
Toscano CA v. DDA Engineers - amending pleadings, construction/design defects
Wade v. State - petit theft
Dellano v. State - mandamus, prerequisites

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Carn v. State – alibi video; discovery violation
Jones v. State – substitution of counsel; eve of criminal trial
Farrell v. State – murder; self-defense
Cleveland Clinic v. Children’s Cancer – unjust enrichment; statute of limitations
Schot v. Schot – modification; parenting plan
Ellison v. State – hearsay; identification; surveillance video
Pembroke Pines v. Corrections Corp – sovereign immunity

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Manor House v. Citizens Prop Ins – consequential damages; appraisal and umpire fees
Boffo v. State – community control, revocation
Hayes v. State – driving with revoked license; motion for judgment of acquittal
Godin v. Owens – paternity, child support, recusal  
Hull v. Hull – relocation, minor children
Rosenhaim v. HMC Assets – foreclosure; reservation of jurisdiction, deficiency
Nero v. State – written order
Nazia v. Amscot – temporary injunction; construction, parking spaces
Jenkins v. State – community control, revocation
Maldonado v. Orange Cty Pub Library Sys – dismissal, negligence, strict liability
Rosen v. State – scrivener’s error
CTA v. State – juvenile commitment, findings
Abramowski v. State – Spencer bar, pro se
Payne v. State – postconviction relief
Evans v. State – Spencer bar, pro se
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.