Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of May 6 - 10, 2019

Appellate & Trial Support   |   May 10, 2019
Share Page

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Myers v. US - tax
Meruelo v. IRS - tax
US v. Rothenberg - restitution
Piazza v. Hale - qualified immunity
Flat Creek Transp v. FMCSA - standing

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

No decisions this week

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Wanless v. State - expert, sanity; sentencing, separate acts
Gloston v. State - kidnapping, attempted sexual battery
King v. DOH - written opinion motion, nurse, license suspension
Goley v. Goley - marital dissolution, equitable distribution, alimony
Daniel v. State - single homicide rule, intradistrict conflict
Segura v. State - certiorari, jurisdiction, awaiting retrial
Philip Morris v. Bryant - Engle progeny; veni, vidi, vici; punitive damages
Reid v. Daley - circuit court jurisdiction, emotional distress damages
Dooly v. State - probation revocation, trial court jurisdiction
Brown v. State - postconviction relief
Couperthwaite v. Couperthwaite - parental timesharing, relocation
Bradford v. FAMU - whistleblower, student
RJ Reynolds v. Cuddihee - prohibition, judicial disqualification

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Thomas v. State - constructive possession, drugs
Famiglio v. Famiglio - premarital agreement, interpretation
de Rubio v. State - postconviction relief
Sammons v. Greenfield - excusable neglect
State v. Bellamy - sentencing
Quijano v. State - probation violation
Wolf v. Wolf - marital dissolution, lack of transcript
Blakeley v. Livorsi - real property, material defect
Forbes v. State - postconviction relief
Wilson v. Amerilife - arbitration

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Odom v. State - closing argument, jail call reference
Fils-Aime v. Roberson - § 57.105 sanctions
LJ v. DCF - dependency
Albear v. Hillman-Waller - lack of transcript
Suarez v. Citizens - settlement proposal, fee award
State v. Gottfried - certiorari, jurisdiction
Link v. State - mandamus, Stand Your Ground
BJ's v. Bugliaro - class certification
Heath v. State - postconviction relief
Troncoso v. Larrain - intervention, findings

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Kemp v. State - Frye hearing, pipeline rule
Plaza La Mer v. Delray Prop Inv - attorney's fees, allocation
Little v. State - competency hearing
Grosso v. HSBC Bank - foreclosure, attorney's fees
Puzio v. State - first degree murder, mandatory minimums
Bellezza v. Menendez - treating physician, financial evidence
White v. State - presentence investigation; Sixth Amendment
Bryant v. Geovera Spec Ins - insurance, confession, bad faith
Palomino v. State - transcript
Bornstein v. Marcus - breach of contract
Hardison v. State - probation revocation, time served
Almazan v. Aguilera-Valdez - prohibition, sanctions, jurisdiction
Jooste v. Jooste - child support, findings
Dunkley v. State - postconviction relief
Kaminsky v. Hechet - personal jurisdiction

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Kiley v. State - sentencing
Gissendanner v. State - investigative costs
Charles v. State - postconviction relief
Manko v. Manko - reopening evidence
Manney v. MBV Eng'g - repose statute, construction
Johns v. State - sentencing
Krol v. FCA - arbitration; MMWA; certified conflict
McKenzie v. State - sexual predator, trial court jurisdiction, certified conflict
Adams v. State - return of personal property
Lancaster v. DOC - second-tier certiorari, habeas corpus, parole violation
Salber v. Frye - certiorari, expert finance arrangements; certified question
Dinnal v. State - sentencing, juvenile
Baruchel v. Dalton - pro se sanctions
US Bank v. Williamson - certiorari, corporate representative, nonresident deposition
Gonzalez v. FNMA - pro se sanctions

©2020 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Subscribe to Publications


The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.