Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of September 16 - 20, 2019
September 20, 2019

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

US v. Florida - ADA, Rehab Act
US v. Kirby - sentencing
Boatman v. Berreto - prison mailbox rule
Managed Care Advisory Grp v. Cigna - arbitration, settlement
Schaw v. Habitat for Humanity - FHAA

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

In re R Reg Fla Bar - amended rules

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Baumgartner v. State - sentencing
Alachua Cnty v. Darnell - sheriff, budgeted funds, county commission
Brownworth v. State - probation revocation
Thompson v. Admiral Mfg - appellate jurisdiction
Liberty Mut v. Miller - appellate jurisdiction
Cummings v. State - postconviction relief
Crowell v. State - felony murder, instructions
Waste Pro USA v. Waste Pro Fla - class certification, FDUTPA
Bartletto v. State - postconviction relief
ADH v. State - competency
Thomas v. Joseph - parenting plan, modification
Norman v. DOC - mandamus, requirements

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

State v. Welch - search and seizure
Stephens v. State - appellate venue
Meuse v. State - criminal restitution
FL-7 v. SWF Premium - broker, commission
TLO So Farms v. Heartland Farms - FDUTPA, inconsistent verdict, manifest weight
Angeles v. State - plea withdrawal
Mikhail v. Mikhail - child support
Dana v. Eilers - prescriptive easement

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Hullick v. Gibraltar Private B&T - defamation per se
Miami Firefighters Rt'mt v. Castro - sovereign immunity, contract
Baker v. Courts at Bayshore - rule 1.540, scrivener's error
AL v. State - speedy trial, juvenile
A&S Ent v. DOR - state audit, tax assessment, due process
Quigley v. Culbertson - marital dissolution, fees
Becker v. Becker - prohibition, judicial disqualification, prior representation
LC v. DCF - certiorari, psychological evaluation
FHSAA v. Johnson - venue; school sports eligibility, injunction

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Beard v. State - relevance, photo of handgun
Everglades Law Ctr v. SFWMD - shade meetings, mediation, confidentiality
Philip Morris USA v. Gentile - fraud, repose period, disclaimed statements
Schroeder v. MTGLQ Investors - foreclosure, doc stamps
Casiano v. State - sentencing, mootness
Fast Funds v. Aventura Orthopedic - relief from judgment, excusable neglect
Jones v. State - resentencing, jurisdiction
Fernandez v. Difiore - default, motion to vacate, due diligence
QL v. DCF - parental rights, termination, evidentiary support
Davis v. State - resentencing, jurisdiction
Condor West Invest v. Cannabis Growth Indus - supplemental pleadings
People's Trust MGA v. Pesta - certiorari; administrative remedies, failure to exhaust
Algaba v. State - pro se sanctions
Kasowitz v. Mariano - certiorari; legal malpractice, accrual, abatement
State v. Sills - certiorari; expert, prescription of controlled substances

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Williams v. River Bend - boundary dispute, water diversion
Jones v. State - suppression, warrantless search; preservation
Turner v. State - closing argument, criminal
Wehr v. State - postconviction relief, concession of error
Turnbull v. State - postconviction relief
Hoyt v. State - Spencer bar, pro se
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.