Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of September 23 - 27, 2019
September 28, 2019

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Broward Bulldog v. US DOJ - FOIA
US v. Annamalai - joinder, First Amendment, sentencing
Playnation Play Systems v. Velex Corp - contempt, sanctions
Callahan v. US DHHS - organ transplantation network
Washington v. Rivera - § 1983, immunity

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

No decisions this week.

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Frasch v. State - Brady; hearsay; withdrawn peremptory challenge
Williams v. State - witness tampering, sentencing
Plummer v. State - fraudulent construction liens, direct contempt
Reid v. Saunders - stalking injunction
Davis v. Gilchrist Sheriff - red flag law, firearms; sequestration; trial time limit
Fla Thoroughbred Breeders v. Calder - gambling, slots, pari-mutuel racing, constitutional challenges
Fernandez v. Manning Bldg Supplies - construction lien, interest rate
Coto v. Univision/Sentry - workers' compensation
Pelham v. State - belated appeal
Hall v. State - sentencing

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Goodman v. State - probable cause, arrest; search and seizure
Heatley v. State - sentencing
Joiner v. Pinellas - ad valorem tax, county-owned land, certified question
de Acosta v. Naples Com Hosp - medical malpractice, rule 1.820, trial de novo
Barr v. Thorpe - appellate jurisdiction
State v. Lincoln - certiorari, Williams rule

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Fernandez v. Marrero - real property, partition, expenses
Harvard Fin Servs v. Remy-Calixte - foreclosure, rule 1.540
Azran Miami 2 v. Deutsche Bank - foreclosure, business records
Umana v. Citizens - summary judgment procedures
Halmos v. Longstock - Applegate affirmance
St Juste v. Deutsche Bank - appellate jurisdiction
JV Air Maint v. Westwind Leasing - aircraft, mechanic's lien
VME Grp v. Grand CA - temporary injunction, condo rules
Auguste v. Aguado - stalking injunction
Luma v. State - pro se sanctions
Johnson v. State - postconviction relief
Harlib v. State - postconviction relief

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Bejarano v. Hollywood - jurisdictional limits, aggregation
Home Ally Fin v. Rosen - voluntary dismissal, vacate
Sherman v. Sherman - costs, standard
Joseph v. DOR - notice, address
KG v. DCF - delay in ruling on of controlled substances

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Schultz v. Moore - injunction, dating violence, sufficient evidence
Norwood v. State - drug trafficking, fundamental error, sufficient evidence
Contardi v. Fun Town - summary judgment, negligence, fall
Yancy v. State - competency, independent assessment
Burnem v. State - probation violation, written order
Taylor v. State - postconviction relief
Acevedo v. State - Anders, discretionary costs, fine
DCF v. Rodriguez - certiorari, involuntary commitment, substantial evidence
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.