Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of April 20 - 24, 2020

Appellate & Trial Support   |   April 24, 2020
Download Download   
Share Share Page

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Robinson v. Planned P'hood - abortion, COVID-19, injunction
Durham v. Rural/Metro Co - Pregnancy Discrimination Act

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Lee v. State - capital case, postconviction relief

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Currie v. State - certiorari, parole
Jacksonville v. O'Neal - workers' compensation
Griego v. State - postconviction relief
Bell v. Bell - timesharing
Gainey v. State - Stand Your Ground
Jackson v. State - murder, drug distribution
Cruz-Cedeno v. State - prior bad acts, implication
Johnson v. State - sentencing
Ops Mgmt v. Johnson - sovereign immunity

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Hetherington v. State - scrivener's error
Green v. State - search and seizure
State v. Brooks - search and seizure
Gavidia v. Wells Fargo - foreclosure, vacatur
Tate v. State - postconviction relief
Brown v. State - probation revocation

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

VME Grp v. Grand CA - appellate attorney's fees
Avael v. Sechrist - rule 1.540, vacatur
Diaz v. Jhonny Salomon MD - medical malpractice, certification
Wilson v. State - mandamus, mootness
Jenkins v. Jenkins - marital dissolution
Lyle v. State - prohibition, Stand Your Ground
Rodriguez v. S Miami - injunctions, public officials, property
RM v. DCF - parental rights, termination
Talarico v. Talarico - timesharing

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Williams v. State - double jeopardy, competency
Torrez v. State - cadaver dog evidence, competency
Dubon v. State - relevance, photographs, competency
Borrero v. State - sentencing
Avatar Prop & Caus v. Castillo - insurance, examinations
Jenkins v. State - oral pronouncement
Izquierdo v. Valle - timesharing modification
State v. Lauriston - public assistance fraud
Rhoulhac v. Francois - supplemental petition, dissolution
Allen v. Allen - marital settlement agreement
Academy For Positive Learning v. School Board of Palm Beach - ad valorem taxes, charter schools
Giniebra v. State - postconviction relief
Williams v. Gonzalez - paternity

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Haeberli v. Haeberli - increased alimony, substantial evidence

©2022 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Subscribe to Publications


The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.