Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of April 27 - May 1, 2020

Appellate & Trial Support   |   May 1, 2020
Download Download   
Share Share Page

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Medley v. Dish Network - FCCPA, TCPA
Knight v. Fla DOC - postconviction relief
Knox v. Roper Pump - employment, discrimination, retaliation
Jacobsen v. Fla Sec of State - elections, ballot challenge, standing
James v. Holman Correctional - postconviction relief
Miami Gardens v. Wells Fargo - Fair Housing Act, en banc vote
Grange v. Baisden - insurance coverage

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

No decisions this week

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Parsons v. Jacksonville - Human Rights Ordinance, challenges
Bank of NY v. Barber - foreclosure, defenses, notice
Walker v. Walker - alimony, findings
Rogers v. State - en banc, sentencing, certified conflict
Bryan v. Wheels - timesharing
Rhoden v. Rhoden - alimony
Harrison v. Lee Auto - FDUTPA
Harris v. State - postconviction relief
Jackson v. State - closing argument
Swander v. State - sentencing
Horn v. State - competency
Rupp v. State - appellate jurisdiction
State Farm v. Markovits - attorney's fees, fees for fees
Kotlarz v. Kotlarz - equalizing payment, collection, fees
Groelinger v. Rogers - appellate jurisdiction
MB Doral v. State - rule challenge, delegated authority, limits
Hoffman v. Hoffman - UM benefits
Williams v. State - reasonable doubt instruction

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Rivera v. State - Stand Your Ground
Street v. Street - marital assets
Bullington v. State - prior consistent statements
Williams v. CVT - surety bond, § 320.27, private action
Zuppardo v. JH Inv - appellate jurisdiction
Peret v. State - bias evidence
Duhamel v. Duhamel - charging lien
Gorman v. State - probation revocation
Schwebel v. State - postconviction relief
Elizon DB Trans Agt v. Ivy Chase - clarification, foreclosure, standing
Paskert v. Steffensmeier - stalking injunction
Helix Elec v. Power Design - personal jurisdiction
Booker v. State - ineffective assistance
Norman v. DCI Biologicals - slip and fall, constructive notice
Uppal v. Nationstar Mort - appellate jurisdiction
Greenspire Global v. Sarasota Green - personal jurisdiction

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Diaz-Silveira v. Diaz-Silveira - equitable distribution
Schminky v. State - murder of law enforcement officer, instructions
Knespler v. State - prosecutor disqualification; grand theft
Najeera v. Tropical Supermarket - summary judgment, grocery
Waldon v. Guardianship of Waldon - probate, guardian, conflict of interest
Aktan v. Gotham Coll Srvs - lack of appellate counsel, transcript
Pritchard v. Levin - fraud, duty to disclose, merger
Jackson v. State - ineffective assistance
Castro v. Mercantil - garnishment
CWelt-2008 Series v. Park Gardens - arbitration, Fla Condo Act
Small v. State - habeas corpus
CD v. State - delinquency
Zaida Plaza v. Acurio - remittitur, lack of transcript
Point Conversions v. Pfeffer & Marin - mandamus

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Klein v. Klein - probate; settlement proceeds, allocation
Ramos v. North Star - direct criminal contempt, perjury, due process
Blinston v. Palm Beach Sheriff's Office - Risk Protection Order, procedure
RB v. State - delinquency, high-risk commitment, DJJ recommendation
Buchmann v. State - sentencing
MB v. DCF - termination, parental rights
Mejia v. Mejia - spousal support, findings
Ross v. Carbone - ex parte injunction

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Pace v. Pace - dissolution, child support, alimony
Jones v. Jones - dissolution, equitable distribution
Wilkins v. State - first-degree murder
Delgado v. Morejon - child support, modification; attorney's fees
Raleigh v. Cornerstone Quarry - foreclosure, notice
Palomino v. State - Anders appeal, scrivener's error
DCF v. Campbell - certiorari, commitment
Wamsley v. State - Anders appeal, written order

©2022 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Subscribe to Publications


The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.