Menu

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of December 28 - 31, 2020

Appellate & Trial Support   |   December 31, 2020
Download Download   
Share Share Page

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Bourdon v. US DHS - petition for rehearing en banc denied
Senter v. USA - postconviction relief
Garcia-Simisterra v. US Atty Gen - immigration, removal

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Ham v. Portfolio Recov - attorney's fees, reciprocity, credit card agreements
Page v. Deutsche Bank - foreclosure, attorney's fees without standing
Wilsonart v. Lopez - summary judgment standard
Jackson v. State - pro se sanctions
In re Fla R Civ P - adopting federal summary judgment standard
In re Fla Prob R - amended rules

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Richardson v. State - sentencing, fundamental error
Calhoun v. State - search and seizure
Signal Hill Golf v. Womack - rule 1.442, settlement proposal
Lincoln Mem Acad v. Manatee Sch Bd - charter school, status revocation
Valle v. Am Airlines - workers' compensation
Schmidt v. State - probation revocation
Smith v. State - prohibition, speedy trial, Covid-19
Statler v. State - sexual battery, constitutional challenge, consent, knowledge
Gallion v. State - grand theft, proof of value
Rushin v. State - sentencing
HMC Assets v. Graybill - default judgment, vacatur

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Kelley v. State - probation revocation
Henry v. State - community control revocation
Riverside Heights v. Tampa - rehearing, community redevelopment, notice
Riviera-Ft Myers v. Florentine Dev - condo declaration, amendment, enforceability, injunction
Haynes v. State - sentencing, certified conflict
Baker v. Westfield Ins - construction, prevailing party, fees
State v. Dixon - criminal restitution
State v. Michaud - certiorari, sentencing

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

No decisions this week.

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

No decisions this week.

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Principal Life Ins v. Halstead - life insurance, plain language
Smithey v. State - postconviction relief
Orange County v. Whitehead - negligence, jury instruction
Elias v. State - child pornography
Jones v. State - murder; improper opening, closing
Barron v. State - probation revocation, notice
Taylor v. State - postconviction relief
Phuong v. Sheriff Mina - appellate jurisdiction, statutory immunity, dismissal
Pantry v. Mijax Manager- restrictive covenant, competing retail business
Borders v. State - postconviction relief
Robinson v. State - criminal, costs
Williams v. State - Spencer warning, pro se


©2020 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Subscribe to Publications

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.