Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of February 24 - 28, 2020

Appellate & Trial Support   |   February 28, 2020
Download Download   
Share Share Page

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Berenguela-Alvarado v. Castanos - Hague Convention
Barrientos v. CoreCivic - TVPA

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

In re Std Jury Instr (Civ) - amended instructions
In re Std Jury Instr (Crim) - amended instructions
In re Std Jury Instr (Crim) - amended instructions
Sweet v. State - capital case, postconviction relief

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Hobbs v. Hobbs - injunction, changed circumstances
Freeman v. State - Stand Your Ground
Faison v. FCOR - appellate jurisdiction

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

JF & LN v. Royal Olds - breach of contract
Tampa Bay Downs v. DBPR - rule challenge, fees
State v. Brookins - search and seizure
NJO v. State - Miranda
Cray v. State - scrivener's error
Lineberger v. State - sentencing
Hicks v. State - search and seizure
Wagner v. Sticky Holsters - appellate jurisdiction
Residents for Better Comm v. WCI Comm - voluntary dismissal, fees
Bouie v. State - Stand Your Ground
Nathey v. Nathey - equitable distribution
Spector Gadon & Rosen v. Davis - fees, inherent authority
Am Coastal v. Residences at Pelican Isle - insurance appraisal
State v. Spears - sentencing, certified conflict

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

FDIC v. Nationwide - limitations, equitable tolling
Walters v. Beach Club - condominium, nondelegable duties, evidence
Union Carbide v. Font - alternative causation evidence; learned intermediary instruction
State v. Marrero - Stand Your Ground
GEICO v. Beacon Healthcare - PIP, massage therapist, physical therapy
Williams v. Ryta Food - slip and fall, summary judgment
Diaz v. Navajas - specific performance, real property
Cohen v. Cohen - settlement agreement, ambiguity
Gyptec v. Hakim-Daccach - injunction, returning funds
Pernetti v. Pernetti - certiorari, indirect criminal contempt
Sedgwick Claims v. Rodriguez - certiorari, punitive damages
Walker v. Rodriguez - certiorari, punitive damages
Afanasiev v. Alvarez - stay away order, due process, notice
Martin v. State - postconviction relief
Bradshaw v. State - postconviction relief
Slaton v. State - postconviction relief
Fernandez v. State - prohibition, judicial disqualification

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Bevans v. State - probation revocation
R.J. Reynolds v. Burgess - concealment, conspiracy
Clark v. Pembroke Pines - inverse condemnation
Rufin v. Borga - sanctions, attorney's fees
Korman v. Stern - service of process
Am Coastal Ins v. Quadomain Condo II - appraisal, evidentiary hearing
Guadagno v. State - prosecution costs
DCF v. FAP - dependency

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Colon v. State - remand; sentencing, 775.082(1)(b)
Lopez v. Hernandez - probate, attorney's fees, lien
Noggle v. State - suppression
Brown v. Norwood - dissolution, alimony, child support
Jamerson v. State - suppression, plea
Jones v. State - ineffective assistance, trial
Smith v. State - Anders, investigative costs
Attride v. Davison - mandamus, appellate record
Scott v. State - Spencer warning, pro se
Adams v. State - Spencer warning, pro se
Crawford v. State - sentence, jail credit

©2022 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Subscribe to Publications


The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.