Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of January 6 - 10, 2020

Appellate & Trial Support   |   January 10, 2020
Download Download   
Share Share Page

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

US v. Oliver - sentencing, ACCA
US Comm Fut Trading Commn v. Escobio - FDCPA, contempt
Paez v. Fla DOC - habeas corpus, judicial notice
Sconiers v. Lockhart - § 1983, 8th Amendment
Us v. Santos - hearsay, confrontation clause, Miranda
US v. Brown - juror removal, forfeiture
Williams v. First Advantage LNS Screening - FCRA, punitive damages
Jordan v. Miss DOC - rehearing, subpoena quash

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

State v. Pacchiana - jury selection, preservation of error
In re Energy Market - citizens' initiative, rejected

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Franklin v. State - evidence, 403, new trial standard
Hancock Whitney v. Adams - garnishment, exemption
Levin v. State - postconviction relief, supplemental record
Villanueva v. State - ethics commission, financial interests

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

State v. Johnson - sentencing
Lewis v. State - criminal restitution
Vann v. State - probation revocation

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

No decisions this week.

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Carroll v. Brennan - attorney's fees, appellate jurisdiction
Nebergall v. State - DNA, in limine ruling violation, mistrial
Office v. Office - attorney's fees, inequitable conduct
Berlin v. FDOT - condemnation, attorney's fees
Edwards v. State - probation revocation
PDK v. McConnell - shareholder agreement, oral modification
Ghani v. Deutsche Bank - foreclosure, default letter, mailing
Harris v. State - stolen property, valuation
Brookshire v. FDOR - child support
Picture It Sold v. Bunkelman - temporary injunction, non-compete
Sapp v. Olivares - punitive damages, amendment
Publix v. Olivares - judicial disqualification
Morris v. State - postconviction relief
Interlandi v. State - sentencing
Jackson v. State - postconviction relief
Batista v. State - postconviction relief
Lugones v. Physicians Indem - foreign subpoena; certiorari

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Sumlin v. Sumlin - dissolution, equitable distribution
Peterson v. State - return of property, hearing
Thomas v. State - sentence, restitution
Serna v. Botero - child support, modification

©2022 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Subscribe to Publications


The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.